Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 43]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Roop Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others on 3 March, 2022

Author: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench: Jyotsna Rewal Dua

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                   ON THE 3rd DAY OF MARCH, 2022

                               BEFORE




                                                          .
             HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ,





                            CHIEF JUSTICE
                                    &





             HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
                 CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.838 of 2022

       Between:-




       ROOP SINGH
       S/O SHRI SURAT RAM,
       R/O VILLAGE & P.O. BATHALAG,
       TEHSIL SOLAN, KOTHI JAMOGI (482),

       DISTT. SOLAN, H.P. PIN: 173 208

                                                          ......PETITIONER
       (BY MR. OM PARKASH GOEL, ADVOCATE)

       AND



    1. THE HIMACHAL PRADESH TOURISM
       DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.,




       THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
       RITZ ANNEXE, SHIMLA-171001





    2. SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, HPTDC,
       RITZ ANNEXE, SHIMLA-171001





                                                     ......RESPONDENTS
       (BY MR. NARESH KAUL, ADVOCATE)

         This   petition   coming   on    for     admission         this     day,
    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohammad Rafiq, passed the following:




                                         ::: Downloaded on - 03/03/2022 20:12:04 :::CIS
                                       -2-


                                  ORDER

This writ petition has been filed by petitioner-Roop Singh, who had retired from the service of the respondents-

.

Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation (HPTDC) on 30.09.2020, with the prayer that the respondents may be directed to pay all his retiral benefits alongwith interest for the delay on the part of the respondents.

2. Reliance has been placed on the judgment passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.3050 of 2014, titled Nek Ram versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 17.07.2014 and also on a subsequent order of this Court dated 25.08.2021, passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021, titled Sh. Subhash Chand versus The Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla and others alongwith connected matters, in which, the respondents were directed to pay the retiral benefits to the petitioners within a period of six months. In case, the required retiral benefits are not paid to the petitioners within the aforesaid period of six months, then in addition to the due statutory benefits, the petitioners shall also be paid interest at the rate of 9% per annum beyond the period of six months till the date of actual payment.

3. In another subsequent order of this Court passed in CWP No.6034 of 2021, titled Ram Lal versus The Himachal ::: Downloaded on - 03/03/2022 20:12:04 :::CIS -3- Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. and another and the connected matter, decided on 23.11.2021, the respondents were directed to make payment of gratuity to the .

petitioners within a period of six months from the date of passing the order. In the event of non-payment of due amount, the petitioners were held entitled to differential amount of interest between the amount of interest statutorily payable to the petitioners as per the Payment of Gratuity Act and the interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the period of delay beyond six months.

4. While disposing of Review Petition No.110 of 2021 on 25.11.2021, preferred against the order dated 09.11.2021 passed in CWP No.6928 of 2021, in which, the aforesaid order dated 25.08.2021 passed in CWP No.4377 of 2021 was relied upon, this Court has clarified the aforesaid order in the terms that the respondent-Corporation shall be liable to pay entire retiral dues of the petitioner, including gratuity, arrears of pension and leave encashment alongwith prescribed rate of interest, within a period of six months from the due date till the actual payment is made.

5. We are, therefore, persuaded to dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondents to pay gratuity to the petitioner with actual rate of interest as per applicable rules, till the time of actual payment. Apart from that, the respondents shall also ::: Downloaded on - 03/03/2022 20:12:04 :::CIS -4- pay to the petitioner the due statutory benefits, other retiral benefits and amount of leave encashment alongwith applicable interest, all of which, shall be paid to him, within a period of six months from today.

.

The due amount of payment, if delayed beyond six months, shall be paid with interest at the rate of 9% per annum till the date of its actual payment.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any.

                    r           to              ( Mohammad Rafiq )
                                                   Chief Justice


                                               ( Jyotsna Rewal Dua )
                                                       Judge


    March 03, 2022
       R.Atal/Mukesh







                                             ::: Downloaded on - 03/03/2022 20:12:04 :::CIS