Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Abhijit Subash Gaikwad And Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra on 29 November, 2019

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

       rpa                       1/3                  909-aba-1777-16-group.doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1777 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1778 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1779 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1780 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1781 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1782 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1783 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1784 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1785 OF                2016
                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1786 OF                2016




::: Uploaded on - 29/11/2019           ::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2019 03:59:21 :::
        rpa                                   2/3                   909-aba-1777-16-group.doc


                                 WITH
                   INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2 OF 2019
                                  IN
             ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1787 OF 2016


      Abhijit Subhash Gaikwad                                      .. Applicant
            Vs.
      State of Maharashtra                                         .. Respondent

                                    ......
      Mr.Sidharth R. Karpe, Advocate for the Applicant.
      Ms.Geeta P. Mulekar, APP for the Respondent - State.
                                    ......

                                        CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATED : NOVEMBER 29, 2019.

P.C. :

The Applicant vide these Applications is seeking permission to travel abroad. The Applicant was granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 6th February, 2017. While granting bail, the Applicant was restrained from going abroad without prior permission of the Court. It is submitted that subsequently vide order dated 13th April, 2018, the Applicant was permitted to travel abroad by this Court.

2 Learned APP submitted that the charge-sheet has been fled against the Applicant and the proceedings are pending before the trial Court. In this circumstances, the Applicant can prefer an Application before the trial Court for travelling abroad. ::: Uploaded on - 29/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2019 03:59:21 :::

        rpa                                3/3                   909-aba-1777-16-group.doc


      3                 Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that the

Applicant intends to go to Bangkok and Pattaya, Thailand, from 9th December, 2019 to 14th December, 2019.

4 In view of the aforesaid circumstances and on account of fling of charge-sheet, the Applicant is permitted to prefer an Application before the trial Court, where the proceedings are pending. The trial Court shall entertain such an Application preferred by the Applicant. Since the Applicant intends to travel from 9th December, 2019 to 14th December, 2019, the Applications be decided expeditiously. Learned Counsel for the Applicant submits that he would prefer the Application before the trial Court on 2nd December, 2019. In the event, such Application preferred, the same may be decided within three days. All Interim Applications stand disposed of accordingly.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 29/11/2019 ::: Downloaded on - 30/11/2019 03:59:21 :::