Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Roshan Ram More vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 January, 2024

Author: Madhav J. Jamdar

Bench: Madhav J. Jamdar

                                                                     30-BA-3334-2023.DOC
2024:BHC-AS:4188
                                                                                 Sonali




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                            CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.3334 OF 2023


                   Roshan Ram More                                    ...Applicant
                         Versus
                   The State of Maharashtra                           ...Respondent


                   Mr. Kuldeep Patil i/b. Ms. Saili Dhuru, Advocates for the Applicant.
                   Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
                   Mr. Siddhesh Yashwant More, Police Hawaldar, Mahad M.I.D.C.
                   attached to Police Station, present.
                   Mr. Vinod Pandit Pawar, Police Hawaldar, Mahad M.I.D.C. attached
                   to Police Station, present.


                                        CORAM         Madhav J. Jamdar, J.
                                        DATED:        29th January 2024
                   PC:-


                   1.     Heard Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

                   and Ms. Shinde, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State.



                   2.     This regular Bail Application is preferred under Section 439

                   of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The relevant details are

                   as follows:-


                    1. C. R. No.                       55 of 2023
                    2. Date of Registration of F.I.R. 13/05/2023
                    3. Name of Police Station          Mahad M.I.D.C. Police Station,




                                                 Page 1 of 7
                                                   30-BA-3334-2023.DOC
                                                              Sonali




                                    Taluka-Mahad, District-Raigad
 4. Section/s invoked               307, 352, 323, 504, 506 of the
                                    I.P.C.,1860 and 3 and 25 of the
                                    Arms Act, 1959.
 5. Date of incident                12/05/2023
 6. Date of arrest                  13/05/2023
 7. Date of filing Charge-sheet     25/07/2023



3.    As per the prosecution case as reflected in the F.I.R. and the

statements of the witnesses, Darshan Dilip Kalambe residing at

Bhivghar, Post-Mohot, Taluka-Mahad, District-Raigad was having

an order of video shooting and photography at village Mohot,

Taluka-Mahad,    District-Raigad.   There   was   some   altercation

between the witness-Darshan Dilip Kalambe and the present

Applicant with respect to taking photographs of certain persons.

When the said incident occurred on 12th May 2023 at about 8.30

p.m., the villagers informed said Darshan that the Applicant is in

the habit of consuming liquor and abusing strangers under the

influence of alcohol. Thereafter, at about 10.15 p.m., said Darshan

again questioned the Applicant about the said altercation when the

Applicant was going to his residence at Mohot Patilwadi, Taluka-

Mahad, District-Raigad. Said Darshan along with his friends was

standing at Mohot Patilwadi bus-stop and at that time, said




                             Page 2 of 7
                                                   30-BA-3334-2023.DOC
                                                               Sonali




Darshan again questioned the Applicant and an altercation broke

out between the Applicant, the witness and his friends. At that

time, the Applicant told said Darshan and his friends to wait at the

said spot and he immediately went to his house on a motorcycle

and brought a gun and fired at said Darshan and his friends.

Sanket Shashikant Kadam and Soham Atmaram Hiradekar were

injured in the said firing.



4.    Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant

submitted that when the incident in question took place said

Darshan and his friends have started the altercations. They

threatened and instigated the Applicant and therefore, the

Applicant went to his house and brought the gun and fired at

them. He submitted that in fact, the pellets were fired in such a

manner that it did not affect the vital parts of the body. He relied

on the injury certificate which shows that injuries are only on the

legs of the injured.



5.    Mr. Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant on

instruction, further states that the said gun is a licenced weapon of

the Applicant's father used for protecting agriculture and the said




                              Page 3 of 7
                                                   30-BA-3334-2023.DOC
                                                               Sonali




licence will be surrendered within a period of 15 days from today.

The said statement is accepted.



6.    Ms. Shinde, learned APP appearing for the Respondent-State

strongly opposed the Bail Application. She pointed out the

statement recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 of the witness-Darshan Dilip Kalambe. She

submitted that the Applicant has used the gun as weapon and

injured the two persons and therefore, this is not a fit case for

granting bail.



7.    The position on record shows that the incident in question

occurred on 12th May 2023. The Applicant was immediately

apprehended and arrested on 13th May 2023. The Charge-sheet has

been filed on 25th July 2023.



8.    The statement of witness-Darshan Dilip Kalambe prima facie

shows that in fact, the said witness and his friends had started the

altercation in question at the relevant time and they instigated the

Applicant. It is true that in the said incident, a gun has been used,




                                Page 4 of 7
                                                   30-BA-3334-2023.DOC
                                                               Sonali




however, the injuries are not on the vital part of the body and the

injuries are on the legs of the injured.



9.    It is an admitted position that the investigation has been

completed and that the Charge-sheet has been filed on 25 th July

2023. There are 31 witnesses as per the Charge-sheet. The trial

will take a considerably long time.



10.   There are no criminal antecedents against the present

Applicant.


11.   The Applicant does not appear to be at risk of flight.

12.   Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by

imposing conditions. In view thereof, the following order:-


                              ORDER

(a) The Applicant-Roshan Ram More be released on bail in connection with C. R. No.55 of 2023 registered with the Mahad M.I.D.C. Police Station, Taluka- Mahad, District-Raigad on his furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties in the like Page 5 of 7 30-BA-3334-2023.DOC Sonali amount.

(b) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep the same updated, in case of any change thereto.

(c) The Applicant shall report to the Mahad M.I.D.C. Police Station, Taluka-Mahad, District-Raigad on the first Sunday of every month between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. until the conclusion of the trial.

(d) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any Police personnel.

(e) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and shall not contact or influence the Complainant or any witnesses in any manner.

Page 6 of 7

30-BA-3334-2023.DOC Sonali

(f) The Applicant shall attend the trial regularly. The Applicant shall co-operate with the Trial Court and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments thereat.

(g) The Applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Officer.

13. The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

[Madhav J. Jamdar, J.] Signed by: Sonali Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Page 7 of 7 Date: 29/01/2024 19:20:33