Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Divya Nair vs Arjun Sasikumar on 26 October, 2020

Author: V. Ramasubramanian

Bench: V. Ramasubramanian

     ITEM NO.1                  Court 11 (Video Conferencing)                     SECTION XVI-A

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Transfer Petition(s)(Civil)                   No(s).       83/2019

     DIVYA NAIR                                                                  Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     ARJUN SASIKUMAR                                                             Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.6308/2019-EX-PARTE STAY Mediation Report
     received.
      IA No. 49352/2019 - APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS
      IA No. 49423/2020 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION
      IA No. 6308/2019 - EX-PARTE STAY
      IA No. 49424/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.
      IA No. 19918/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
     DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES
      IA No. 30684/2019 - VACATING STAY)
     WITH
     T.P.(C) No. 463/2019 (XVI-A)
     (FOR
     FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 37085/2019
     IA No. 37085/2019 - STAY APPLICATION)

     Date : 26-10-2020 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN


     For Petitioner(s)                  Mr. Ranjith K. C., AOR

                                        Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR
                                       Ms. Priyashree Sharma Ph, Adv.

                                        Mr. Ranjith K. C., AOR


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

Signature Not Verified This is a case where both parties entered into a Digitally signed by Rachna Settlement Date: 2020.10.26 16:19:41 IST Agreement. Under the terms of the Settlement Reason:

Agreement, the parties agreed to have dissolution of their ...2/-
- 2 -
marriage by mutual consent. They also agreed that the custody of the minor boy will be with the father until the boy completes the age of 14. The mother was granted Visitation Rights, Permanent Alimony and the right to have transfer of some property towards settlement of maintenance.
Unfortunately, both parties have complaint against each other that the terms of the Settlement Agreement are not being complied with.
In order to enable the parties to move forward for the enforcement of the Settlement Agreement, it was suggested by this Court that the petitioner\wife shall visit Ernakulam on a date pre-fixed by her and will stay at Ernakulam for a period of 4-5 days or for a period as required by the Husband to complete all the formalities. During the period of the stay of the wife at Ernakulam, the husband shall effect transfer of the property as agreed under the Settlement Agreement and the wife shall make payment of the amount agreed. During the period of her stay at Ernakulam, the husband shall hand over the temporary custody of the child to the wife. Both parties shall ensure that they do not go to the Police and harass each other during this period. Both parties shall endeavour to honour the commitment under the Settlement Agreement. After all the formalities are completed at Ernakulam, the wife may hand over the custody of the child to the husband and return back. The remaining terms of the Settlement Agreement should form part of the final order to be passed in the Transfer Petition.
Call the matters after three weeks.
(RAJNI MUKHI)                                 (DIPTI KHURANA)
COURT MASTER (SH)                           COURT MASTER (NSH)