Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Deepak Khosla vs Pavan Bakshi & Others on 10 August, 2017

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Chander Bhusan Barowalia

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                            Cr. MPs No. 11078, 11079 & 11080 of
                            2013 in Cr. MMO No. 111 of 2010
                            Decided on: 10.08.2017
     _______________________________________________________________




                                                                           .
     Deepak Khosla





                                          .....Applicant/petitioner
                             Versus
     Pavan Bakshi & others
                                    ......Non-applicants/respondents





     _______________________________________________________________
     Coram
     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.

     The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.





     1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
     _______________________________________________________________
     For the applicant/petitioner :
                    r                                             None.


     For the non-applicants/respondents :                     None.

     ___________________________________________________________________________________
     Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)

Cr. MPs No. 11078, 11079 & 11080 of 2013 Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate, appears and states that on the last date of hearing, he was instructed by the applicant/petitioner to make request for adjournment only for that day and today he has no instruction whatsoever to appear on his behalf.

2. The case was called repeatedly, however the applicant/petitioner has not chosen to appear before this Court, in addition to that, the applicant/petitioner has also not taken steps for the service of private respondents.

1

Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2017 23:56:36 :::HCHP

Therefore, the applications stand dismissed for non-

appearance, as also for want of prosecution.

.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 10th August, 2017 (raman) ::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2017 23:56:36 :::HCHP .

::: Downloaded on - 11/08/2017 23:56:36 :::HCHP