Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Mallisetty Siva Sankar Prp Siva vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 5 June, 2025

      lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl


                      THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY--OF JUNE

                      TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE


                                         PRESENT
    THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM


                      CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5718 OF 2025


Between :

1. Mallisetty Siva Sankar @ PRP Siva, S/o. Pullaiah, Aged 45 Years, R/o.

   Podalakur Village, Podalakur Mandal, SPSR Nellore District

2. MalI'Setty Lavanya, W/o Malisetty Siva Sankar, Aged 38 years, House wife,
   R/o Podalakur Village, Podalakur MandaI, SPSR NeIIore District

3. Challa Srinivasulu, S/o. Rangaiah, Aged about 35 years. Driver R/o.

   Maruthi Nagar, Police Line, Podalakur, SPSR Nellore District


                                                 ...PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 3

                                           AND


   The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep by its Station House Officer, Podalakur,

   SPSR     NeIIore    District,    through   Public     Prosecutor,   High    Court    Bids,

   Amaravati


                                                 M.RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT


       Petition   under Section 482 of BNSS Act,                  praying that in the
circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criininal Petition,

the High Court may be Pleased to enlarge the petitI'Oner / Accused No. 1 to
3 on bail in the event of their arrest by the police, P S Podalakur, Sri Potti

sriramulu   Nellore    District    in   connection     with   Crime    No.    85/2025   for

offences under Sections 329(3), 324(4) R/w. 3(5) of BNS Act.
                 This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum

 of\Gru'ounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.
grJan;-rdhan Rao, Advocate for the Petitioners -and the Public Prosecuto'r
   ...   is
         `\`'




 (Ap) on behalf of the Respondent

 The Court made the following:
  APHCO10277252025

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
                                   AT AMARAVATl                        [3505]
     EiLE                   (Special Original Jurisdiction)


                    THURSDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE
                    TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

                                   PRESENT

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

                     CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5718/2025

Betwee n :

Mallisetty Siva Sankar @ Prp Siva and Others    ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)

                                     AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and         ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S)
Others

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):

     1.T JANARDHAN RAO

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

     1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Court made the following:

       This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., iS filed by the

petitioners herein/accused Nos.1 to 3 seeking to grant anticipatory bail in
Crime No.85 of 2025 of Podalakur Police Station, Sri Potti Sriramulu Nellore

District, registered for the offences punishable under Section 329(3), 324(4)
r/w 3(5) of BNS.


2.       Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences alleged
are punishable with imprisonment up to seven years and prays this Court to
direct the police to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 35(3)

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
      3.      On the other hand, learned Assistant public Prosecutor did not oppose         _tiig i
     the same and concurred wl-th the submission made by the learned counsel for
     the petitI'OnerS for the reason that the offences alleged are punI'Shable with
  l'mprisonment up to seven years and undertakes to issue notI'Ce under Section
  35(3) of the BNSS.

 4.         Heard, perusedthematerl-alon record.

 5.        Since the offences alleged are punI-Shable with imprisonment up to

 seven years, thI-S Court dllrects the police to follow the procedure as
 contemplated under section 35(3) of the Bharatl'ya Nagarik suraksha sanhI|ta,
 2023, scrupulously, as per the guidelI'neS enunciated in Amesh Kt,mar vs.


 csof:::tloonfs,BJ'-I:haorutaanndy daenf:::ter7     The petltlOners sha" comply wlth the

6.         with the above djrectl[onsj the crI'mjnal Petjtjon is dI-SPOSed of.


          Miscellaneous applications pending, I-f anyJ Shall stand closed.


  1 (2014) 8 SCC 273




 To,                                   //TRUE COPY//              ASSISSsTdEAffi:
 1. The station House officer, podalakur police Station, srI-Pottl-srI'ramulu

       Nellore Dl-strict


2. One cc to srj T.Janardhan Rao, Advocate [opuc]

3. Two        cc to    public   prosecutor,       High   court of Andhra    pradesh   a{
      Amaravathi. [ouT]

4. Three CD Copies


MV


TF
                          T \.



                                1


                        • '' g5fa
HIGH COURT                          \




DATED: 05/06/2025




ORDER
CRLP|No.5718 of 2025

DISPOSING OF THE CRLP