Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Ms Arun Enterprises Through Its Sole ... vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd And Ors on 17 January, 2014

Author: Narendra Nath Tiwari

Bench: Narendra Nath Tiwari

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                    C.M.P. No. 81 of 2013

          M/s Arun Enterprises                   ..Petitioner
                            Versus
          Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. .....Respondents
                                  -----
          Coram:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

          For the Petitioner               : Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate
          For the Respondents              : Mr. Amar N. Gupta, Advocate
                                           ----
04/17-1-2014

In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for restoration of W.P.C. No. 3368 of 2005, which was dismissed due to non appearance of the counsel when the case was called out on 14.05.2012.

It has been stated that due to inadvertence of the advocate 's clerk, the said case could not be marked in the list and the petitioner's counsel could not attend the case when the same was called out.

It has been submitted that there was no wilful negligence on the part of the petitioner as well as its counsel and petitioner's counsel could not attend the case under the aforesaid circumstance beyond his control. It has been further submitted that there are good grounds for success in the writ petition and if the same is not restored, the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents-opposite parties has not disputed the said grounds and the reasons explained in the petition.

Considering the reasons explained in the petition, this Court is satisfied that there was inadvertance on the part of the petitioner's counsel and under that circumstance, he could not attend the petitioner's case when the same was called out.

In view of the above, this C.M.P. is allowed. W.P.C. No. 3368 of 2005 is restored to its original file and stage.

( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/