Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Ms. Priya Sharma vs Veer Namad South Gujarat University on 23 February, 2009

                       CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                              Room No. 415, 4th Floor,
                            Block IV, Old JNU Campus,
                                New Delhi - 110067.
                               Tel : + 91 11 26161796

                                                             Decision No. CIC /SG/C/2008/00185/1917
                                                                Complaint No. CIC/SG/C/2008/00185

Complainant                               :        Ms. Priya Sharma
                                                   Samrat 120, Sameshwara Enclave
                                                   V.M Road, Vesu, Surat

Respondent                                :        Public Information Officer
                                                   Veer Namad South Gujarat University
                                                   University Campus, Surat-395007

Facts arising from the Complain:

Ms. Priya Sharma, had filed a RTI application with the PIO, Veer Namad South Gujarat University, University Campus, Surat on 08/08/2008 asking for certain information. Since no reply was received within the mandated time of 30 days, she had filed a complaint under Section 18 to the Commission. The Commission issued a notice to the PIO on 07/01/2009 asking him to supply the information and sought an explanation for not furnishing the information within the mandated time.

The Commission has neither received a copy of the information sent to the complainant, nor has it received any explanation from the PIO for not supplying the information to the complainant. Therefore, the only presumption that can be derived is that the PIO has deliberately and without any reasonable cause refused to give information as per the provisions of the RTI Act. His failure to respond to the Commission's notice shows that he has no reasons for the refusal of information.

Decision:

The Complaint is allowed.
The PIO will send the complete information to the complainant before March 20, 2009. The PIO's action clearly amounts to denial of information without any reasons. The PIO is therefore, asked to submit a written explanation showing cause as to why penalty should not be imposed and disciplinary action be recommended against him under Section 20 (1) & (2) of the RTI Act before March 25, 2009.
If the information has already been supplied to the complainant, furnish a copy of the same to the Commission with your written submission.
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.
Shailesh Gandhi Information Commissioner February 23, 2009.
(For any further communication quote the decision no. given at the top.)