Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Manish Subhash Kapoor vs Maulin Rameshchandra on 25 June, 2013

Author: S.G.Shah

Bench: S.G.Shah

  
	 
	 MANISH SUBHASH KAPOOR....Applicant(s)V/SMAULIN RAMESHCHANDRA PRAJAPATI
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	

 
 


	 


	R/CR.RA/384/2013
	                                                                    
	                           ORDER

 

 


 
	  
	  
		 
			 

IN
			THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
		
	

 


 


 


CRIMINAL REVISION
APPLICATION  NO. 384 of 2013
 

================================================================
 


MANISH SUBHASH
KAPOOR....Applicant(s)
 


Versus
 


MAULIN RAMESHCHANDRA
PRAJAPATI  &  1....Respondent(s)
 

================================================================
 

Appearance:
 

MR
EKANT G AHUJA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 

MS
JIRGA JHAVERI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
 

================================================================
 


	 
		  
		 
		  
			 
				 

CORAM:
				
				
			
			 
				 

HONOURABLE
				MR.JUSTICE S.G.SHAH
			
		
	

 


 Date : 25/06/2013
 


 ORAL ORDER

Ld. Advocate Mr. Ekant Ahuja for the petitioner states that he may withdraw the application if he is allowed to cross-examine the complainant and to take all the grievances and issues raised in this application before the trial Court, while cross-examining the complainant. It is clear and certain that present applicant can cross-examine the complainant on all issues including factual details so far as the averments and order below exh. 36 are concerned. The trial Court should not restrain the applicant to cross-examine the complainant on all such aspects. On making such observation, Ld. Advocate for the petitioner wants to withdraw the application. Application stand disposed of as withdrawn.

(S.G.SHAH, J.) * Pansala.

Page 2 of 2