Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Mohammad Salim Shaikh S/O Khalid Chand ... vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 25 January, 2024

Author: Revati Mohite Dere

Bench: Revati Mohite Dere

2024:BHC-AS:4587-DB

                                                                                 13-Wp-3491-2023.doc


                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                               CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3491 OF 2023


                   Mohammad Salim Shaikh S/o Khalid
                   Chand Shaikh                                               .... Petitioner
                                    Versus
                   The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.                          .... Respondents


                  Mr. S. G. Mishra, for the Petitioner.

                  Mrs. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent - State.

                  Mr. S. S. Sabale, P.S.I., Manikpur Police Station, is present.


                                                      CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE &
                                                             MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, JJ.

DATE : 25th JANUARY 2024 P.C. :

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent No.3 - The Assistant Commissioner of Police, to carry out thorough, effective and proper investigation in C.R. No. 286 of 2022, registered with the Manikpur Police Station. Some other Chaitanya Jadhav 1/3 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2024 12:43:40 ::: 13-Wp-3491-2023.doc ancillary reliefs are also sought i.e. a direction to respondent No.3 to inform this Court, the steps taken for investigation of the aforesaid crime; and transfer of investigation to Crime Branch.
2. Learned A.P.P. on instructions states that the police of Manikpur Police Station, have, after proper investigation filed charge-sheet in the said case on 27rd January, 2023, i.e. even prior to the filing of the aforesaid petition.
3. It appears that the petitioner was not aware of the filing of the charge-sheet on 27th January, 2023, pursuant to which the aforesaid petition was filed in April, 2023. Accordingly, nothing survives for further consideration in the aforesaid petition.
4. At this stage, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has been receiving threats from the accused Chaitanya Jadhav 2/3 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2024 12:43:40 ::: 13-Wp-3491-2023.doc persons and as such, seeks police protection. Learned A.P.P. states that it is open for the petitioner to file an appropriate application seeking police protection, before the competent authority and the competent authority, on verifying the threat perception, will take appropriate steps.
5. Accordingly, it is open for the petitioner to file an appropriate application, seeking police protection before the concerned authority. If an application is filed, the concerned authority to decide the said application expeditiously and in accordance with law, after assessing the threat perception to the petitioner.
6. Petition stands disposed of as aforesaid.

MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

          Digitally
          signed by
          CHAITANYA
CHAITANYA ASHOK
ASHOK     JADHAV
JADHAV    Date:
          2024.01.31
          16:16:25
          +0530


       Chaitanya Jadhav                                                                                  3/3



                          ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                ::: Downloaded on - 12/02/2024 12:43:40 :::