Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Pradeep Singh Pahal vs M/S Tdi Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Formerly ... on 24 July, 2017

Bench: Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar

     SLP(C) 5124-25/2016
                                                        1

     ITEM NO.11                                COURT NO.2                      SECTION XVII

                                  S U P R E M E C O U R T O F             I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                         No.5124-5125/2016

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 21-09-2015
     in FA No. 1423/2014 21-09-2015 in FA No. 1138/2014 passed by the
     National Consumers Disputes Reddressal Commission, New Delhi)


     PRADEEP SINGH PAHAL                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

     M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD FORMERLY                                    Respondent(s)
     KNOWN AS INTIME PROMOTERS PVT. LTD.
     THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR


     Date : 24-07-2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today.


     CORAM :
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR


     For Petitioner(s)                 Ms.    Vibha Datta Makhija, Sr. Adv.
                                       Mr.    S. Hasan Isfahania, Adv.
                                       Mr.    Parvaz Zaidi, Adv.
                                       Mr.    K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya, AOR

     For Respondent(s)                 Mr.    Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.
                                       Ms.    Kanika Agnihiotri, Adv.
                                       Mr.    Kamal Rathee, Adv.
                                       Ms.    Saneha J., Adv.
                                       Mr.    Ankur Prakash, AOR


                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

The only issue that arises for consideration in Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by these special leave petitions is whether the petitioner is a CHETAN KUMAR Date: 2017.07.25 18:04:23 IST Reason: consumer or not. The matter was referred for mediation, but the same has failed.

SLP(C) 5124-25/2016 2 Mr. Shyam Divan, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that certain shops are available and the petitioner can visit the site and see them and, if the petitioner finds them suitable, the respondent shall hand over one of them to him adjusting the price component. Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would like to have the money refunded with interest.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the respondent shall deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees ten lakhs only) before the Registry of this Court within four weeks hence. If the amount deposited within the stipulated time, the same shall be kept in a short term fixed deposit in the UCO Bank, Supreme Court Compound, New Delhi, so that interest can be accrued on the same.

Call on 21st November, 2017, for final disposal.

             (Chetan Kumar)                                     (H.S. Parasher)
              Court Master                                        Court Master