Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri. S.T. Chandraiah vs State Of Karnataka on 16 September, 2016

Bench: Chief Justice, Ravi Malimath

                          1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

      DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2016

                       PRESENT

       THE HON'BLE MR. SUBHRO KAMAL MUKHERJEE,
                    CHIEF JUSTICE
                         AND
        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

      WRIT APPEAL NOS. 3424-3426 OF 2016 (S-RES)
Between:
1.    SRI S.T. CHANDRAIAH
      S/O THIMMAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
      WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR
      WARD NO.93, OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      VASANTHNAGAR, QUEENS ROAD
      BANGALORE-52

2.    T THIMME GOWDA
      S/O THIMMAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
      WORKING AS REVENUE INSPECTOR
      WARD NO.122, OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      VIJAYANAGAR
      SWIMMING POOL COMPOUND
      1ST FLOOR, 9TH CROSS
      RPC LAYOUT, BANGALORE-40

3.    SRI C RAMACHANDRAIAH
      S/O LATE CHIKKANNA
      AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
                          2

      WARD NO.97, OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      SRIRAMAMANDIRA, RTO COMPLEX
      2ND BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR
      BANGALORE-10
                                     ... APPELLANTS

(BY SRI M S BHAGWAT, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI SRINIVAS V, ADVOCATE)

And

1.    STATE OF KARNATAKA
      BY ITS SECRETARY TO
      URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
      VIDHANA SOUDHA
      BANGALORE-560001

2.    THE COMMISSIONER
      BBMP, N R SQUARE
      BANGALORE-560001

3.    SMT. Y.M.PUSHPAVATHI
      D/O N.MUNITHIMMAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      IN THE OFFICE OF
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      BBMP, YELAHANKA
      BANGALORE-560064

4.    SMT. DEEPA S. RAJESH
      W/O RAJESH T.V.
      AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      IN THE OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      BBMP, LAGGERE
      BANGALORE-560058
                         3


5.   MURALI MOHAN N
     S/O NAGARAJA
     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
     WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
     IN THE OFFICE OF
     ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
     BBMP, MARTHALLI
     BANGALORE-560037

6.   ABHILASH N S/O NAGARAJ M
     AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
     WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
     IN THE OFFICE OF
     ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
     BBMP, GAALI ANJANEYA TEMPLE
     BANGALORE-560026

7.   MANU S/O BABU CHAVAN
     AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS
     WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
     IN THE OFFICE OF
     ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
     BBMP, BOMMANAHALLI
     BANGALORE-560068

8.   SIDRAMESHWAR KUDRAPPA SHARANAWAR
     S/O RUDRAPPA ERASANGAPPA SHARANWAR
     AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
     WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
     IN THE OFFICE OF THE
     DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVN)
     N.R.SQUARE, BBMP, BANGALORE-560001

9.   SMT. MEGHANA
     D/O VASUDEVA B A
     AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS
     WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
     IN THE OFFICE OF THE
                           4

      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      BBMP, VIJAYANAGAR
      BANGALORE-560040

10.   SMT. SWETHA E D/O ERANNA K
      AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      IN THE OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      BBMP, VIJAYANAGAR
      BANGALORE-560040

11.   SUDEEP J S/O JAYARAM
      AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      IN THE OFFICE OF THE
      ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      BBMP, GAALI ANJANEYA TEMPLE
      BANGALORE-560026

12.   SMT. ASHABIBI K D/O KARIM
      AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      IN THE BBMP, GAALI ANJANEYA TEMPLE
      BANGALORE-560026

13.   C.PRAKASH S/O CHINNAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      OFFICE OF ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      UTTARAHALLI SUB-DIVISION
      BANGALORE-560061

14.   N.R.ANIL KUMAR
      S/O LATE N.M.RAMAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
      WORKING AS TAX INSPECTOR
      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
                           5

      UTTARAHALLI SUB-DIVISION
      BANGALORE-560061

15.   NAGARAJEGOWDA
      S/O CHIKKARASE GOWDA
      AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      VIDYARANYAPURA SUB-DIVISION
      BANGALORE-560097

16.   H.V.SRIDHAR
      S/O LATE H.N.VENKATRAMANAPPA
      AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA
      BANGALORE-560091

17.   H.N.SIDDEGOWDA
      S/O H.S.NANJE GOWDA
      AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
      OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER
      AAROHALLI, BANGALORE-560091
                                    ... RESPONDENTS

(BY MISS NILOUFER AKBAR, AGA FOR R-1;
 SMT. B V VIDYULATHA, ADVOCATE FOR
 SRI T P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-3 TO 11;
 SRI PRUTHVI WODEYAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R-13 & 14)

      THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4
OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET
ASIDE    THE   ORDER   PASSED    IN   WRIT   PETITION
NOS.39770-39772/2016 DATED 30/08/2016.


      THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS
DAY, THE CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                      6

                                 JUDGMENT

The objections pointed out by the office are over- ruled.

2. As prayed for by Mr.M.S.Bhagwat, learned advocate appearing for Mr.Srinivas V, the appeals are taken up for preliminary hearing.

3. These appeals are against an ad interim order of injunction passed by the Hon'ble Single Judge dated August 30, 2016, in a batch of writ petitions, in aid of the main petition.

4. The writ petitioners were before the Hon'ble Single Judge challenging the seniority list by Tax Inspectors on the allegation that persons, who have been directly recruited in the year 2008, were placed at the top of the promotees of the year 2003.

5. The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike contended before the Hon'ble Single Judge that the seniority list was prepared following the quota system. 7

6. The Hon'ble Single Judge, in order to balance the situation, passed an interim order, holding that any promotion to the post of Revenue Inspector would abide by the result of the writ petitions.

7. We do not think that the Hon'ble Single Judge, while passing the ad interim order, has exceeded his jurisdiction, requiring interference by this court.

8. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed.

9. However, the Hon'ble Single Judge is requested to dispose of the writ petitions as expeditiously as possible, subject to the convenience of the Court.

10. We make no order as to costs.

Sd/-

CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE vgh*