Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Manakkatt Mohammed Niyas vs Methukeyil Veetil Ummer on 24 February, 2022

Author: C.S.Dias

Bench: C.S.Dias

CMCP No.30/2021                              1/1

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                     PRESENT
                        THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS
           Thursday, the 24th day of Februay 2022 / 5th Phalguna, 1943
                   I.A.NO.1/2021 IN RFA NO. 176/2021(INDIGENT)
                   OS 162/2012 OF SUB COURT, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM
   PETITIONER/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:

          MANAKKATT MOHAMMED NIYAS, AGED 44, S/O MARAKKAR UMMER, NHALAKAM
          KARA, THRIKKAKARA NORTH, KANAYANNUR TALUK, HMT COLONY P.O.,ERNAKULAM
          DISTRICT.

   RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

      1. METHUKAYIL VEETIL UMMER, AGED 46, S/O MOHAMMEDALI, ATTATHODU
         MADRASSAPPADI, PARIYAPURM AMSOM, PANANGATTOOR DESOM, TIRUR TALUK,
         PIN -676302.
      2. CHEVIDIKUNNAN VEETTIL SHIHABUDHEEN, AGED 40, S/O MOIDEEN,
         IRINGALLOOR AMSOM, KUZHIPPURAM DESOM, THIRURANGADI TALUK, PIN-
         676306




        Application praying that in the circumstances stated in the
   affidavit filed therewith the High Court be pleased to issue an order
   calling upon the respondents to show cause why they shall not be called
   upon to furnish security for the amount of Rs.55,30,000/- and in the
   meanwhile, issue an order of interim conditional attachment, attaching the
   properties described more fully in the schedule filed hereunder, coming
   with the TANUR SRO , Thanur Village and Malappuram District.

        This application coming on for orders upon perusing the application
   and the affidavit filed in      support thereof, and upon hearing the
   arguments of    SRI.DINESH R.SHENOY, SRI.EBIN MATHEW, & SRI. P.ROHIT
   PREMANANDAN , Advocates for the petitoner and of SRI.SAYEED MANZOOR,
   SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN, Advocates for R1, the court passed the following.

                                             ORDER

The interim conditional attachment is extended by three months.

Sd/-C.S.DIAS, JUDGE 24-02-2022 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar