Madras High Court
Palamalai Padayachi And Anr. vs Shanmuga Ausari on 6 February, 1894
Equivalent citations: (1894)ILR 17MAD302
JUDGMENT
1. This is clearly a suit within Section 3 of the Regulation, and we mast, therefore, answer the question in the affirmative. There is no necessary conflict between the two cases cited in the order of reference. JUDGMENT
2. In accordance with the opinion of the Full Bench we set aside the decree of the District Judge and restore that of the District Munsif.
3. Respondent must pay appellants' costs in this Court and also in the Lower Appellate Court.