Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 15, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Babulal Ganju vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 August, 2011

Equivalent citations: 2011 (4) AIR JHAR R 350

Author: D.N. Upadhyay

Bench: D.N. Upadhyay

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                      B.A. No. 4383 of 2011
                                   ------
          Babulal Ganjhu           ...    ...  ..... ... ... Petitioner
                                   Vs.
          The State of Jharkhand          .... ..    ...     Opp. Party
                            ------
          CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY
                                   _______
          For the Petitioner:      Mr. A.K. Pathak
          For the Opp. Party:       A.P.P
                            ------
05/09.08.2011

The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 302, 452, 364, 121, 121A, 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code; Section 17/18 of the C.L.A Act and Sections 3/4/5/20/21 of POTA.

There is allegation that MCC, members of extremists, armed with deadly weapon entered into the house of informant and dragged out the two brothers, Yamuna Singh and Chandrapal Singh, and both were done to death. During investigation, the complicity of the petitioner has come in light and he was remanded in this case on 14.5.2008.

It is submitted that other co-accused like, Kuldip Singh, having similar allegation, has been granted bail by this Court vide B.A. No. 2487 of 2008. The name of this petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Nakul Jee @ Nakul Yadav. Besides confessional statement, there is nothing against him.

Learned counsel for the State does not opposed the prayer for bail.

From perusal of the confessional statement of Nakul Jee @ Nakul Yadav, recorded in paragraph 166 of the Original Case Diary, it appears that name of petitioner has come in light but the Investigation Officer has not collected cogent evidence against the petitioner to justify his detention. Since, other co- accused has been granted bail by this Court, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Fast Track Court, Lohardaga in connection with S.T No. 123 of 2008.

(D.N. Upadhyay, J) Alankar/-