Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Kerala High Court

Thomas Abraham vs The Peermade Co-Operative ...

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

   

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                               PRESENT:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

        THURSDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 37653 of 2009 (B)
                                   ----------------------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------

            THOMAS ABRAHAM, AGED 63 YEARS,
            S/O. ABRAHAM, PUNJAKUNNEL HOUSE, (PUTHIYATHU)
            DYMUKKU, PERIYAR, PEERMADE,
            IDUKKI.

            BY ADV. SRI.M.J.THOMAS

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------

        1. THE PEERMADE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL
            AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED NO. 1-273
            REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

        2. THE PEERMADE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL
            AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED NO. 1-273
            KUMILI BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER.

        3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER /A & E
            INSPECTOR, THE PEERMADE CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL
            AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK LIMITED NO. 1-273
            ELAPPARA, IDUKKI.

        4. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
            PINAVU, IDUKKI.

            R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.JOICE GEORGE
            R3 & 4 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18-12-2014,
            THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


PJ

WP(C).No. 37653 of 2009 (B)
----------------------------------------

                                            APPENDIX

PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS
-----------------------------------

P1:       COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4/7/07 OF THE KERALA STATE FARMERS DEBT
          RELIEF COMMISSION

P2:       COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30/8/07, 29/10/2007 AND 31/12/2007

P2(A): COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30/8/2007 29/10/2007 AND 31/12/2007

P2(B): COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 30/8/2007

P3:       COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20/5/2009 ISSUED BY THE R2

P4:       COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE R4

P5:       COPY OF LETTER DATED 15/9/2008 ISSUED THE WIFE OF THE PETITIONER

P6:       COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 23/11/09 ISSUED BY THE R3

P7:       COPY OF THE CIRCLULAR NO.1/2009

P8:       COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 17/12/09 TO THE R4

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS
--------------------------------------

R1(A): COPY OF THE DETAILS OF THE LOAN ACCOUNT OF THE PETITIONER AND HIS
          WIFE SHOWING THE DISBURSEMENT AND OTHER PARTICULARS.

                                                               / TRUE COPY /


                                                               P.S. TO JUDGE
PJ



                 K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
             =====================
              W.P.(C) No.37653 of 2009 - B
            ======================
       Dated this the 18th day of December, 2014

                      J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the recovery proceedings initiated in around 10 transactions; the petitioner had with the respondent Bank. The petitioner contends that, since the respondent Bank is an Agricultural and Rural Development Bank, the proceedings for recovery are covered under the The Kerala State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank Act, 1984 and there is no dispute resolution system provided therein. In such circumstance, the petitioner prays that the respondent Bank issue a statement of accounts showing the credit made as also the debit made in the account including interest levied. The petitioner shall pay the same in instalments, is the prayer.

2. The learned Counsel for the respondent Bank who earlier appeared in the matter submits that he has W.P.(C) No.37653 of 2009 - B 2 relinquished the vakalath. It is to be noticed that the writ petition has been pending from 2009. Considering the confined prayer made by the petitioner it is only proper that the petitioner be issued with a statement of accounts as indicated above, showing the dues as on 10.01.2015. It is made clear that separate statement of accounts shall be issued in the separate loan accounts. The petitioner shall remit the entire balance due in all the transactions in ten monthly instalments starting from 19.01.2015 and followed up on the 19th of each succeeding month. The recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance till then. If two consecutive defaults are committed, recovery steps initiated shall revive and continue The writ petition would stand disposed of with the above observations.

Sd/-

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.