Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 12, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Karthik vs The Inspector Of Police on 13 July, 2022

Author: V.Sivagnanam

Bench: V.Sivagnanam

                                                                             Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022


                         BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                 DATED: 13.07.2022

                                                        CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM

                                         Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022 and
                                           Crl.M.P(MD).No.7957 of 2022


                Karthik                                                           ...Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                1.The Inspector of Police,
                Kenikarai Police Station,
                Ramanthapuram District.
                (Crime No.354 of 2016)

                2.Rajeshwaran                                                 .. Respondents


                PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying

                to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.

                354 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.

                                       For Petitioner     : Mr. J. Vishnu

                                       For 1st respondent : Mr.M.Sakthikumar
                                                            Government Advocate (Crl. Side)




                1/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                                Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022


                                                        ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No. 354 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police and quash the same.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that a case was registered against the petitioner in Crime No.354 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police for an offences alleged under Sections 147, 448, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(i) IPC on 13.05.2016. Subsequently, it has been altered into Sections 147, 448 and 294(b) IPC alone. He further submitted that the limitation for criminal proceedings for these offences only for three years. Further, the respondent police has not converted the said Crime as CC and hence, it is barred by limitation and prayed to quash the above said proceeding.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that the case was registered against the petitioner in Crime No.354 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police for an offences alleged under Sections 147, 448, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(i) 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022 IPC on 13.05.2016 and subsequently, it has been altered into Sections 147, 448 and 294(b) IPC alone. He would further submit that sofar, final report has not been filed.

4. On perusal of the records it reveals the fact that the case has been registered against the petitioner in Crime No.354 of 2016 on the file of the first respondent police for an offences alleged under Sections 147, 448, 294(b), 323, 427 and 506(i) IPC on 13.05.2016 and subsequently, it has been altered into Sections 147, 448 and 294(b) IPC alone. Section 147 IPC is punishable with imprisonment for 2 years or fine or both; Section 448 IPC punishable with imprisonment for 1 year or fine or both and 294(b) IPC is punishable with 3 years imprisonment or fine or both. As per Section 468(2)

(c) Cr.P.C., any offence is punishable with more than 1 year, the limitation period is only 3 years. Admittedly, the case has been registered in the year 31.05.2016, within the statutory period final report has not been filed. Therefore, this case is statutory bar and hence, the same is liable to be quashed and accordingly, the First Information Report registered against the petitioner in Crime No. 354 of 2016 on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed.

3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022

5. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

13.07.2022 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order trp To

1.The Inspector of Police, Kenikarai Police Station, Ramanthapuram District.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022 V.SIVAGNANAM, J.

trp Crl.O.P.(MD) No.12558 of 2022 and Crl.M.P(MD).No.7957 of 2022 13.07.2022 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis