Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Om Prakash vs State Of Rajsthan And Ors. on 16 May, 2014
Author: Vineet Kothari
Bench: Vineet Kothari
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6250/2013
Om Prakash V/s State of Rajsthan and ors.
Order dt: 16/5/2014
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
ORDER
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6250/2013
Om Prakash V/s State of Rajasthan and ors.
Date of Order ::: 16th May, 2014
PRESENT
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
Mr.Kailash Khatri, for the petitioner.
Mr.V.K. Mathur, for the respondents.
---
BY THE COURT:
1. The only prayer made in the present petition filed by the petitioner on 31.5.2008 is that for the delay in payment of retiral dues, no interest has been paid to him under Section 89 of the Rajasthan Service Rules.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kailash Khatri submitted that even though the respondents have agreed that there was no fault on the part of the present petitioner in such delay and it was on account of administrative reasons that such delay in payment of retiral dues like, gratuity, leave encashment etc. was there, no interest has bene paid to him. The relevant part of the office note of the respondent - Department produced by the petitioner as Annex.10 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6250/2013 Om Prakash V/s State of Rajsthan and ors.
Order dt: 16/5/2014 2/3 is quoted below for ready reference:-
"र जसवक क पशन पररल भ क भगत न यद 60
द वस क पश त ह त ह त 9 पततशत क र स बय ज क
भगत न करन क प वध न र जस" न सव तनयम क तनयम
89 म तनमन पक र स ह-
"89. Interest on delayed payment of retiral benefits:
If the payment of retiral benefits has been authorized after 60 days from the date when its payment became due, and it is established that the delay in payment was not on account of failure on the part of the Government servant in compliance of the procedure laid down in this chapter or elsewhere in these rules, interest @9% per annum from the date retiral benefits become due would be payable till the end of the month of proceeding the month in which the retiral benefits are authorized."
इस पकरण म ववत (तनयम) ववभ ग स भ) र य ल* गई ह ज अन.- 212 स 220/एन पर ह। ववत (तनयम) ववभ ग क अभभमत बय ज भगत न क ब र म ह।
इस पकरण म र जसवक इस ववलमब क भलय उतर य) नह*2 ह वरन यह ववलमब पश सतनक क रण स हआ ह। अत:
ववत (तनयम) ववभ ग क र य अनस र ह* क य4व ह* करन उच6त ह ग ।
Sd/-
स2यक ववचध पर मश8"
3. The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the delay was caused by the Pension Department and not by the S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6250/2013 Om Prakash V/s State of Rajsthan and ors.
Order dt: 16/5/2014 3/3 Commercial Taxes Department.
4. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that the delay on account of administrative reason as admitted by the respondents is sufficient to entitle the present petitioner for the interest as per Rule 89 quoted in the aforesaid part of the order and therefore, the petitioner is entitled to the grant of interest on the said retiral dues.
5. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to pay interest on the delayed payment of retiral dues to the petitioner within a period of three months from today including the part of retiral benefits, if so far withheld. No order as to costs. A copy of this order be sent to the parties concerned forthwith.
(Dr. VINEET KOTHARI), J.
ss/-
19