Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Manika Garg & Anr vs Unitech Real-Tech Properties Limited, ... on 21 July, 2022

Author: Prateek Jalan

Bench: Prateek Jalan

                          $~5
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

                          +      ARB.P. 727/2019

                                 MANIKA GARG & ANR.                                  ..... Petitioners
                                             Through:            Mr. Nitin Gupta, Mr. Sahil Chopra,
                                                                 Ms. Aadrisha Gautam and Mr.
                                                                 Himanshu Chopra, Advocates.

                                                            versus

                                 UNITECH REAL-TECH PROPERTIES
                                 LIMITED, & ORS.                                    ..... Respondents
                                                Through:

                          CORAM:
                          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

                                                ORDER

% 21.07.2022

1. Mr. Himanshu Chopra, learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the respondents in the present case are Unitech Limited and its subsidiaries. As far as Unitech Limited is concerned, Mr. Chopra points out that by an order dated 20.01.2020 in Civil Appeal No. 10856/2016 [Bhupinder Singh vs. Unitech Ltd,], the Supreme Court has inter alia directed as follows:-

"(vii) Pending further orders of this Court, there shall be a moratorium against the institution of proceedings against Unitech Limited and its subsidiaries. The moratorium shall also extend to existing proceedings against the company as well as the enforcement of orders that may have been passed against the company;"

Mr. Chopra states that the aforesaid order continues to subsist.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed ARB.P. 727/2019. Page 1 of 2 By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:22.07.2022 12:17:47

2. Mr. Chopra is directed to place on record, a copy of the aforesaid order dated 20.01.2020.

3. In view of the aforesaid, the hearing of the present petition is adjourned to 07.10.2022.

4. In the event the order of moratorium is vacated or varied by the Supreme Court, so as to enable the present petition to proceed, the petitioner is directed to place the same on record by way of an application in these proceedings immediately.

PRATEEK JALAN, J JULY 21, 2022 'vp'/ Click here to check corrigendum, if any Signature Not Verified Digitally signed ARB.P. 727/2019. Page 2 of 2 By:SHITU NAGPAL Signing Date:22.07.2022 12:17:47