Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Kirit Somaiya vs Municipal Corporation Of Greater ... on 31 January, 2024

Author: G.S. Patel

Bench: G.S. Patel

                                                                   902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC




                                                                                                   Arun


                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                              ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                    WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 8973 OF 2023


                    Pratima Ramsevak Yadav                                             ...Petitioner
                          Versus
                    Slum Rehabilitation Authority SRA                               ...Respondent

                                                      WITH
                                   WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 31340 OF 2023

                    Gangadhar Narayan Gurav                                            ...Petitioner
                          Versus
                    The State of Maharashtra Through Chief                          ...Respondent
                    Secretary

                                                      WITH
                      PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 32725 OF 2023


ARUN
                    Kirit Somaiya                                                      ...Petitioner
RAMCHANDRA
SANKPAL                    Versus
Digitally signed
                    Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors                  ...Respondents
by ARUN
RAMCHANDRA
SANKPAL
Date: 2024.01.31
18:09:12 +0530                                        WITH
                      PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 25004 OF 2022

                    Tushar Mahdeo Kadam                                                ...Petitioner
                           Versus
                    State of Maharashtra & Ors                                     ...Respondents

                                                      WITH


                                                     Page 1 of 6
                                                  31st January 2024


                   ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                        ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 :::
                                                 902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC




   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 32984 OF 2023
                                   WITH
           INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 338 OF 2024
                                     IN
   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 32984 OF 2023

 Sagar Kantilal Devre                                               ...Petitioner
        Versus
 State of Maharashtra Through Chief Secretary                    ...Respondent


 Ms Gulnar Mistry, with Santosh Gupte i/b Divya Parab, for the
       Petitioner in WP(L)/8973/2023.
 Mr Rakesh Agarwal, with Aarti Dharamsy i/b Shivaji Nirmale, for
       the Petitioner in WP(L)/31340/2023.
 Mr Mayur Khandeparkar, with Simantini Mohite, for the Respondent
       in both Writ Petitions.
 Mr PG Lad, with Sayli Apte, for the Respondent-MHADA in both Writ
       Petitions.
 Mr GS Hegde, Senior Advocate, i/b PM Bhansali, for the
       Respondent-MMRDA.
 Dr BG Saraf, Advocate General, with Uma Palsuledesai, AGP, for
       the Respondent-State in WP(L)/8973/2023.
 Mr Vishal Thadani, Addl GP, for the Respondent-State in
       WP(L)/31340/2023.
 Mr Mukesh Vashi, Senior Advocate, with Aditya Bhatt, Parth
       Turkhia, for the Petitioner in PIL(L)/32725/2023.
 Mr Vivek Shukla, Bushra Sayyed i/b Pragya Mishra, for the Petitioner
 in PIL(L)/32984/2023.
 Mr Joel Carlos, with Oorja Dhond, i/b SK Sonawane, for the
       Respondent-MCGM in          PIL(L)/32725/2023.
 Dr B Saraf, Advocate General, with Jyoti Chavan, GP, for the
       Respondent-State in both PILs.




                                  Page 2 of 6
                               31st January 2024


::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                        ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 :::
                                                    902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC




 Mr Vishwanath Patil, for Respondent No 5 (MPCB) in
      PIL(L)/32984/2023.
 Mr GS Hegde, Senior Advocate, with PM Bhansali, for the
      Respondent-MMRDA.
 Mr Jagdish G Reddy, for Respondent No 6 in PIL(L)/32984/2023
      and Respondent No 10 in PIL(L)/32725/2024.
 Mr GS Godbole, Senior Advocate, with Sumit Kothari, Kaustubh
      Thipsay, for Respondent Nos 12 & 13 in PIL(L)/32725/2023 and
      for the Applicant in IA(L)/338/2024 In PIL(L)/32984/2023.
 Dr Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate, i/b Gurudeep Singh Sahar, for
      Respondent No 5 in WP(L)/32725/2023.
 Mr Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate, i/b Ishan Srivastava, for
      Respondent No 14 inPIL(L)/32725/2023.
 Ms Rutuja Patil, with Yohaan Shah, Hasan M i/b Negandhi Shah &
      Himaytullah for Respondent No 16 in PIL(L)/32725/2023.
 Mr Ankur Shah, i/b Nishank Barolia, for Respondent No 17 in
      PIL(L)/32725/2023.
 Mr PG Lad, with Sayli Apte, for Respondent-MHADA.


                               CORAM      G.S. Patel &
                                          Kamal Khata, JJ.
                               DATED:     31st January 2024
 PC:-


1. These matters were before us yesterday. At that time Mr Vashi, learned Senior Advocate for the Public Interest Petitioner, Kirit Somaiya, in Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 32725 of 2023 had only part of his proposed amendment. On behalf of Mr Sagar Kantilal Devre, the PIL Petitioner in Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 32984 of 2023, the amendment was not even ready. We stood over these matters to today.

Page 3 of 6

31st January 2024 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 ::: 902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC

2. We are shown the amendment in the Kirit Somaiya matter. It is taken on record and marked "X" for identification with today's date. We permit the amendments which are in two parts. The amendments are to be carried out on or before 5th February 2024. Reverification will be required.

3. We also permit the amendment in the second Public Interest Litigation by Mr Devre. That only seeks the addition of two parties. Therefore, we dispense with reverification. The draft amendment is taken on record and marked "X1" for identification with today's date. The amendments are to be carried out on or before 5th February 2024.

4. We note that in neither of the PILs has Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority ("MMRDA")being made a party. In view of our previous order of 3rd November 2023 in Writ Petition No. (L) No. 8973 of 2023, we believe it is necessary to have the MMRDA be joined as party Respondent in both Public Interest Litigations. We direct that amendment also to be carried on or before 5th February 2024 on the same terms as indicated earlier.

5. Copies of the amended Petitions are to be served on all Respondents including newly added Respondents or their Advocates (as the case may be) no later than by 9th February 2024. Where Affidavits in Reply have not been filed, these are to be filed and served on or before 26th February 2024. Given the nature of the challenges, we do not think that Rejoinders will be of much Page 4 of 6 31st January 2024 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 ::: 902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC assistance. If a Rejoinder is required in any matter, we will see on the next date.

6. In our order previously made on 3rd November 2023 in Writ Petition (L) No. 8973 of 2023 (Pratima Ramsevak Yadav and Ors v Slum Rehabilitation Authority and Ors) we made certain observations. Pursuant to that the State Government constituted a Task Force under the chairmanship of Mr Justice DB Bhosale, former Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court.

7. Dr Saraf, learned Advocate General, stated that the Report was available. Yesterday it was in Court in seal. Today he states that the Report has been accepted by the State Government for consideration of its recommendations. Consequently, all concerned on all sides are at liberty to take copies of the Report from the Registry against paying payment of the regular copying charges.

8. For the present we list the matters high on board on 29th February 2024 subject to final numbering of these Petitions and Applications. We make it clear that by the next date all Public Interest Litigations, Writ Petitions and Interim Applications are to be finally numbered with all objections removed.

9. This will be on the basis that unless there is some other compelling reason we propose to proceed with these matters on that date and dispose them of as early as possible at the stage of the admission.

Page 5 of 6

31st January 2024 ::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024 ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 ::: 902-903-OSWPL-8973-2023+.DOC

10. We clarify that all issues are kept open including maintainability.

 (Kamal Khata, J)                                             (G. S. Patel, J)




                                  Page 6 of 6
                               31st January 2024


::: Uploaded on - 31/01/2024                        ::: Downloaded on - 02/02/2024 04:19:58 :::