Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 2]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Kanwar Amardeep Singh vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 17 December, 2018

Author: Sureshwar Thakur

Bench: Sureshwar Thakur

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH              SHIMLA .

Cr.M.P(M) No. 1578 of 2018 Decided on : 17.12.2018                                                                                                                                             Kanwar Amardeep Singh          .....Petitioner. 

Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent. Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge.
Yes. 
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tanuj Thakur, Advocate.  
For the Respondent­State: Mr.   Hemant   Vaid,   Additional Advocate General with Mr. Vikrant Chandel   and   Mr.   Yudhveer   Singh Thakur, Deputy Advocate Generals. 
SI Devi Singh, I/O P.P City Bilaspur in person. 
                                                                                                                                           
Sureshwar Thakur, J (oral) The instant petition, stands instituted by the bail petitioner, under, Section 438 Cr.P.C, wherethrough, he seeks grant of anticipatory bail qua him, given his apprehending his arrest, for his allegedly committing offence punishable, under Section   376   of   Indian   Penal  Code,  in   case FIR  No. 25/18 of 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2018 22:55:45 :::HCHP
...2...
30.10.2018 registered with WPS Una District Una, Himachal .

Pradesh.  

2. The Investigating Officer SI Suman Sharma, Police Station   Woman,  Una, is present in  Court,  and, has made  a disclosure before this Court, that, the petitioner has enabled effectuation of recovery of laptop.   She further submits  that the accused had rendered to her, his fullest cooperation.

3. Be that as it may, the prosecutrix is a married lady aged about 37 years and is mothering a daughter aged about 6 ½ years, begotten from her marriage with one Mannu Sharma.

A   perusal   of   status   report,   discloses   that   she   had   for   a continuous period of three months resided, at the home of the accused/bail  applicant, and, throughout the afore  period  she was   subjected   to   repeated   sexual   intercourse,   by   the   bail applicant,   under,  pretext(s)   of   marriage   proffered   to   her,   by the bail applicant.     The succumbing(s) of the prosecutrix to the sexual overtures, of the bail applicant, under, pretext(s) of marriage proffered, to her by the latter, would hold sway, only ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2018 22:55:45 :::HCHP ...3...

upon, the bail applicant after subjecting her to a singular or .

may be a couple of sexual intercourse, his, thereafter resiling therefrom,   (a)   and,   obviously   the   effect   of   rather   repeated succumbing(s)   of   the   prosecutrix,   under,   purported   repeated allurement(s),   of,   marriage   meted   by   the   accused   to   the prosecutrix,    (b)   begets, a, conclusion that, all the repeated sexual intercourse perpetrated, upon her person, by the bail applicant,   being,   not   under   any   pretext   of   or   allurement   of marriage, proffered to her, by the bail applicant. 

4. Consequently, and, further given the bail applicant, hence,  rendering the fullest cooperation  to the Investigating Officer, and, also with investigations into the alleged offences, being complete, besides when at this stage, no material stands placed by the prosecution, demonstrating, that in the event of bail   being   granted   to   the   bail   applicant,   there   being   every likelihood   of   his   fleeing   from   justice   or   tampering   with prosecution   evidence,   thereupon   this   Court   is,   hence, ::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2018 22:55:45 :::HCHP ...4...

constrained to afford, the facility of bail, in favour of the bail .

applicant.

5. Accordingly, the indulgence of bail is granted to the bail   applicant,   and,   the   order   rendered   on   20.11.2018   is confirmed, on, the following conditions:­ 1. That he shall join the investigation, as and  when   required   by   the   Investigating agency;

2. That he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from  disclosing such facts to the Court or to the  Police;

3. That  he shall not leave India without the  previous permission of the Court; 

4. That   he   shall   deposit   his   passport,   if any,  with the Police Station, concerned;

5. That in case of violation of any of the conditions, the bail granted to the petitioner shall be forfeited and he shall be liable to be taken into custody;

::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2018 22:55:45 :::HCHP

...5...

6. That   he   shall   apply   for   bail   afresh .

when   the   challan   is   filed   before   the   trial Court.

6. In view of above, petition stands disposed of.  Any observation   made   herein   above   shall   not   be   taken   as   an expression of opinion on the merits of the case and the trial made herein above. 

Court shall decide the matter uninfluenced by any observation Dasti Copy. 

17th December, 2018.        ( Sureshwar Thakur ), (priti)    Judge. 

::: Downloaded on - 19/12/2018 22:55:45 :::HCHP