Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Manjuben Daughter Of Bhimabhai ... vs State Of Gujarat on 12 August, 2014

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

       R/CR.MA/11306/2014                            ORDER



         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 11306 of 2014

================================================================
     MANJUBEN DAUGHTER OF BHIMABHAI KATARIYA....Applicant
                          Versus
               STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DEEP D VYAS, ADVOCATE for the Applicant.
MR LB DABHI, LD.ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent.
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

                            Date : 12/08/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for regular bail in connection with an offence being C.R.No.I- 82 of 2014 registered with Junagadh Taluka Police Station, Junagadh.

2. Mr.Deep D. Vyas, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that considering the nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.

3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has opposed grant of regular bail looking to the nature and gravity of the offence.

4. Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the Page 1 of 3 R/CR.MA/11306/2014 ORDER respective parties do not press for further reasoned order.

5. I have heard learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties and perused the papers of investigation and considered the allegations levelled against the applicant and the role played by the applicant, who is lady accused and the applicant has also filed the cross-complaint.

6. In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made against the applicant in the FIR, without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion and enlarge the applicant on regular bail. Hence, the present application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection with an offence being C.R.No.I-82 of 2014 registered with Junagadh Taluka Police Station, Junagadh, on executing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousands only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court and subject to the conditions that she shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b] not act in a manner injuries to the interest of the prosecution;

[c] surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d] not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

Page 2 of 3
            R/CR.MA/11306/2014                                             ORDER



     [e]        furnish         latest     address        of    residence      to    the

Investigating Officer and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

7. The Authorities will release the applicant only if she is not required in connection with any other offence for the time being. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the learned Lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in accordance with law. At the trial, learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.

Direct service is permitted.

[A.J.DESAI,J.] *dipti Page 3 of 3