Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Ganesh Kumar vs The Union Of India & Ors on 4 March, 2016

Author: Vikash Jain

Bench: Vikash Jain

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13777 of 2011
                      ======================================================
                      Ganesh Kumar, S/O Ramprit Singh, Resident of Village- Belsar, P.O.
                      Anirudh Belsar, P.S. Vaishali, Distt. Vaishali, Bihar. 8444111.

                                                                            .... ....   Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                      1. The Union of India.
                      2. The Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum, New Delhi.
                      3. The Bharat Corporation Ltd. through Its Chairman, Bhart Bhawan, 4 and
                      5, Karimbhai Road, Belard estali, Post Box No.688, Mumbai-400001.
                      4. The G.M. Markeing Bhart Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Patna LPG
                      Territory & Bottling Plant, Fatuha Industrial Area, Fatuha, Patna-803201
                      Bihar.
                      5. The Deputy General Manager (LPG), Patna LPG Territory & Bottling
                      Plant, Fatuha Industrial Area, Fatuha, Patna-803201 Bihar.
                      6. The Senior Manager (LPG), Patna LPG Territory & Bottling Plant,
                      Fatuha Industrial Area, Fatuha, Patna-803201 Bihar.
                      7. The Territory Manager (LPG), Patna LPG Territory & Bottling Plant,
                      Fatuha Industrial Area, Fatuha, Patna-803201 Bihar.

                                                             .... .... Respondents
                      ======================================================
                      Appearance :
                      For the Petitioner/s : None
                      For the Respondent/s : None
                      ======================================================
                      CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN
                      ORAL ORDER

7        04-03-2016

Despite repeated calls no one appears on behalf of any of the parties.

2. The application is dismissed for non-prosecution on behalf of the petitioner.

(Vikash Jain, J) Vats/-

U