Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Kambar Kunhammad'S Son Kunhipoker vs Kambar Kunhahammad (Mentally ... on 14 January, 2020

Author: Devan Ramachandran

Bench: Devan Ramachandran

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT

           THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN

    TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020 / 24TH POUSHA, 1941

                        RFA.No.147 OF 2004(C)

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 37/1992 DATED 29-07-2003 OF
                       SUB COURT, MANJERI


APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:

             KAMBAR KUNHAMMAD'S SON KUNHIPOKER
             ORAKAM MELMURI AMSOM, DESOM,, ERNAD TALUK.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.BIJU ABRAHAM
             SRI.B.G.BHASKAR

RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

      1      KAMBAR KUNHAHAMMAD (MENTALLY RETARDED) (DIED,LRS
             IMPLEDED), S/O. KUNHAHAMMAD BY GUARDIAN WIFE -
             KAPODATHU, MUHAMMEDS DAUGHTER PATHUMMA,, OORAKAM
             MELMURI AMSOM DESOM, ERNADU TALUK.

      *2     PATHUMMA, AGED 63 YEARS, W/O LATE KAMBAR
             KUNHIMUHAMMED, OORAKAM MELMURI AMSOM DESOM,
             ERNADU TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676509

      *3     MUNEER, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O LATE KAMBAR
             KUNHIMUHAMMED, OORAKAM MELMURI AMSOM DESOM,
             ERNADU TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676509
             (THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED RESPONDENT ARE
             IMPLEADED AS ADDITIONAL RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 VIDE
             ORDER DATED 30/8/19 IN IA 609/18).

             R1 BY ADV. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER SR.
             R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR
             R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN

     THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD         ON
14.01.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
 RFA 147/04
                              2




                          JUDGMENT

There was no appearance for the appellant when this matter was called yesterday. It is no different today. I am inferentially led to the opinion that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal any further. Consequently, this appeal will stand dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-


                                  DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
      RR                                JUDGE