Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur

Mahendra Kumar Agarwal vs Shri Narayan Lal Agarwal And Anr on 27 November, 2018

Author: Pankaj Bhandari

Bench: Pankaj Bhandari

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

             S.B. Criminal Revision No. 126/2017

Mahendra Kumar Agarwal S/o Shri Chaturbhuj Agarwal B/c
Mahajan, R/o C-20, Sawai Jaisingh Highway Banipark, Jaipur Raj
                                                     ----Petitioner
                              Versus
1.     Shri Narayan Lal Agarwal S/o Shri Pannalal Agarwal, R/o
       1012, Misraji Ka Rasta, Chandpole Bazar, Jaipur Propritor
       Naresh And Company
2.     State Of Rajasthan Through Pp
                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)      :   Mr. Anoop Pareek
For Respondent(s)      :   Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP
                           Mr. Ummed Khicher



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

                       Judgment / Order

27/11/2018

1.   Petitioner has preferred this revision petition aggrieved by

judgment and order dated 22.04.2009, passed by Additional Chief

Judicial Magistrate No.12, Jaipur and against judgment and order

dated 09.01.2017, passed by Additional District and Sessions

Judge No.7, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur, whereby, petitioner has

been convicted for offence under Section 138 of Negotiable

Instruments Act.

2.   It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that parties have

amicably settled the dispute and have arrived at a compromise.

3.   Complainant is present in person in Court who has no

objection to compounding of the offence.
                                                                           (2 of 2)             [CRLR-126/2017]



                                   4.        It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is

                                   on dialyses and is on death bed. The fine imposed in pursuance of

                                   the direction of the Court below be waived.

                                   5.        I have considered the contentions.

                                   6.        Considering the contentions of counsel for the petitioner

offence is compounded and revision petition deserves to be and is accordingly, allowed. Petitioner is acquitted from the charges levelled against him and Judgment and order passed by the Court below are quashed and set aside.

7. Application for suspension of sentence and application for filing of compromise deal also stands disposed of.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J Arti/15 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)