Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 9]

Chattisgarh High Court

Rohit Kumar Patel And Others vs Smt.Ful Kumari Devi And Others 9 ... on 1 October, 2018

Author: Sanjay K. Agrawal

Bench: Sanjay K. Agrawal

                                          1

                                                                             NAFR

             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         SECOND APPEAL No. 82 of 2004

     1. Rohit Kumar S/o Vijayshankar Caste - Aghariya, aged about 27 years,
        Occupation - Agriculture and Service, R/o Village Gobarsingha, Tahsil
        Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

     2. Santoshi, S/o Vijay Shankar, Caste - Aghariya, aged about 21 years,
        Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Kankidiya, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh
        (C.G.)

     3. Chamarin Wd/o Vijay Shankar, Caste - Aghariya, aged about 50 years, R/o
        Village Gobarsingha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)
                                                         ---- Appellants / Plaintiffs

                                       Versus

     1. Smt. Fulkumari Devi, W/o Lalchanda Patel, Caste Aghariya, R/o
        Gobarsingha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District Raigarh (C.G.)

     2. Vidyadhar, S/o Ghansiram, Caste - Aghariya, aged about 70 years,
        Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Gobarsingha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District
        Raigarh (C.G.)

     3. Radheshaya S/o Ghansiram, Caste - Aghariya, aged about 58 years,
        Occupation - Agriculture, R/o Gobarsingha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District
        Raigarh (C.G.)

     4. Rameshwar S/o Ghansiram Caste - Aghariya, aged about 55 years,
        occupation Agriculture, R/o Gobarsingha, Tahsil Sarangarh, District
        Raigarh (C.G.)

     5. State of Chhattisgarh, throught the Collector, Raigarh (C.G.)
                                                                  ---- Respondents

For Appellants : None Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 01/10/2018

1. Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the appellants, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution. 2

2. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka