Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Priya Kishore Jena vs State Of Odisha on 25 November, 2020

Author: S.K. Sahoo

Bench: S.K. Sahoo

                                BLAPL No. 4656 of 2020




                   Priya Kishore Jena
                   @ Papu                                 .......           Petitioner
                                                          -Vrs.-
                   State of Odisha                        .......            Opp. Party


04.   25.11.2020            This   matter      is     taken      up   through   Video
                   Conferencing.
                            Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
                   learned counsel for the State.
                            This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C.
                   in connection with Simulia P.S. Case No.170 of 2019
                   corresponding to C.T. Case No.568 of 2019 pending in the
                   file of learned J.M.F.C., Soro for alleged commission of
                   offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
                          The prayer for bail of the petitioner has been rejected
                   by the learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Balasore vide order
                   dated 19.06.2020.
                          Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
                   petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.08.2019 and he has
                   been charge sheeted for commission of the offence under
                   section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. He further submitted
                   that the occurrence in question took place on 21.06.2019
                   and the deceased Sarat Nayak died on 25.06.2019 and as
                   per the eye witness account of Kalandi Nayak, the main
                   allegation of assault is against co-accused Srikanta Nayak
                   who stated to have assaulted on the head of the deceased
                   by means of lathi which resulted in his death and similarly
                   situated co-accused namely Rajendra Nayak has been
                   released on bail in BLAPL No.244 of 2020 and therefore, the
                   bail   application   of   the    petitioner   may   be   favourably
     considered.
           Learned counsel for the State has produced the case
    diary and after verifying the case diary, he fairly submitted
    that the petitioner is similarly situated like the co-accused
    Rajendra Nayak.
           Considering the submissions made by the learned
    counsel for the respective parties, the nature of accusation
    against the petitioner, since the main allegation of assault
    is   attributed   against   co-accused   Srikanta   Nayak   and
    similarly situated co-accused has already been released on
    bail, taking into account the period of detention of the
    petitioner in judicial custody, I am inclined to release the
    petitioner on bail.
           Let the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid
    case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.20,000/-(rupees
    twenty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like
    amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin
    over the matter with further conditions as the learned Court
    may deem just and proper.
           The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
           Issue urgent certified copy as per Rules.


p                                            .............................
                                              S.K. Sahoo, J.