Karnataka High Court
M/S Ravi Construction Co vs The Union Of India on 4 August, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
Bench: Ajit J Gunjal
>n. 'WK mwmmawmfimfiufi mwn wwwmf wt MWWAEAHA x-mam CWUWV {W Kfififlafiifiwfixfifl WGH COURT OF Kfiafi1E'~'>éé3;%;"?«'£§%.?*IEZ::'% H35" fifiiffi"? OF Kfiflflfifflfl WGH COURT 1:: THE man ccxmw 01? KARNATAKA AT DATED ms THE 411! my or Aueusféfg H? _ nus. RAVI conmmxmwrme, _ 30.3353/c,1a'm mm, x rm,xwrna-E,rswmmm'--.es,'««.AJ=%%_ REP. msmamimnww, * HAHAGING:.PAR'1'f€EI2," V % 3[OilUTHI!_G(:lj'vI3ND"ER,4_ A PETITIORER (BY wvmam
- M1. ?..I fiisJz~r dié V4 « msrra mwmxn mnzwnv.
RE1?.'BY GERERAL IIARAGER, % awR,%m2:m§eUARmm, L mmm.
Q2. nvzomcna n COHETRUCTIOII', W%'1'E§1'I RAILWAY, "m;1a,mwm mum.
gm1m.nz.om-45. KESPOEDENTB ' ' ~ " am.n.s.9.m.mrA aownmnnvucasmy iviviii wwwmm Ma" mmmm:mMr=\.aw NRWH ¢...ulJI£IA :U'I7': RAKNAIAIKA Hifiifl CUURT W? KARMKWRKA HNSH COURT $3? 3%?-3<2~§'§§%&7"AKPa IWGH CQURT 0? KKRWWFRKA HSGH COURT af plmadiugu under the new net. It 'a "j . : if _ cxtmctttu: ends: passed by the learned V apph.cat:a1' ' under cm: 23 Rule 1 of 7 um under Section 3 of may by avezitglxthe had 51.4 the ooxutmtnad or as main-star ~..;:Vr:.§r1f.'§yV_.!-Irstfblae application allowed.
gamma; so farithch-aw with liberty to be Eleni."
____ he noticed that whanavar an {Egg fir withdrawal, it in time and again V V An application 73 filfi ufim Order 23 a1 fi of the , it shouki be " But ifliberty is aougfm by the applicant tn ' flesh provoeedm on the sum cause at' actian and f'pe:rm'aaiun '3 accorded, it 73 not open fin' the other side to aonnmdtlnatthepzaentproceedmarenotmaintairmblefll (F -