Section 10A(b) in The Rajasthan Subordinate Courts Case Flow Management Rules, 2006
(b)If the Court passes an ad-interim ex-parte order in an interlocutory application, and the reply by the defendants is filed, and, if, thereafter the plaintiff fails to file the rejoinder (if any) without good reason for the delay, the Court has to consider whether the stay or interim order passed by the Court would be vacated and will list the case with that purpose. This is meant to prevent parties taking adjournment with a view to have undue benefit of the ad-interim orders. The plaintiff may, if he so chooses, also waive his right to file a rejoinder. A communication of option by the plaintiff not to file a rejoinder, made to the Court will be deemed to be the completion of pleadings in the interlocutory application.