Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs M/S Pratham Developers on 23 July, 2021

Bench: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hemant Gupta

      ITEM NO.18                 Court 7 (Video Conferencing)             SECTION III

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
                                          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)          No(s).   9020/2021

      (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-03-2020
      in TA No. 26/2020 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)

      THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VADODARA                 1Petitioner(s)

                                                 VERSUS

      M/S PRATHAM DEVELOPERS                                            Respondent(s)


      Date : 23-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

      CORAM :
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
                            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA


      For Petitioner(s)               Mr.   Balbir Singh, ASG
                                      Mr.   D.L. Chidananda, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Praveena Gautam, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Shyam Gopal, Adv.
                                      Ms.   Meena Patel, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Udai Khanna, Adv.
                                      Mr.   B. V. Balaram Das, AOR

      For Respondent(s)


                            UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                           O R D E R

Learned Additional Solicitor General submits that even dependent on the extent of infraction there are different views of High Courts qua allowing deduction under Section 80IB (10) of the Income Tax Act,1961 and in any case the Order relied upon dealt with infraction upto 25% whereas in the facts of the present case the infraction is 35%.

Issue notice.

Signature Not Verified

Digitally signed by Dr.
Mukesh Nasa
Date: 2021.07.27
19:04:20 IST              [RASHMI DHYANI]                     [POONAM VAID]
Reason:
                          COURT MASTER                     COURT MASTER (NSH)