Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Priyanka.C.S.(Minor) vs The Commissioner For Entrance on 12 August, 2014

Author: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

Bench: A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR

               TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/21ST SRAVANA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 14363 of 2011 (U)
                                      ----------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------

            PRIYANKA.C.S.(MINOR),D/O.C.K.SEKHARAN,
            CHOLLANAL HOUSE, CHEMPANTHOTTY.P.O,NEDIYANGA
            VILLAGE, THALIPARAMBU TALUK, KANNUR DISTRICT
            KERALA, NOW RESIDING AT 41/7TH STREET, DAE TOWNSHIP
            KALPAKKAM, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU
            REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER C.K.SEKHARAN

            BY ADV. SRI.B.PREMOD

RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------

        1. THE COMMISSIONER FOR ENTRANCE
            EXAMINATIONS, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHI NAGAR
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

        2. THE TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE,THALIPARAMBU,
            KANNUR DISTRICT-670631.

            R2 BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.RAFEEK.V.K

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 12-08-2014,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:



                A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
               ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
                      W.P.(C).No.14363 of 2011
               ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
               Dated this the 12th day of August, 2014


                            J U D G M E N T

It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner Sri.B.Premod, that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns/