Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court

Nicco Corporation Limited vs Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Limited & ... on 12 February, 2010

Author: Patherya

Bench: Patherya

                      GA No. 393 of 2010
                     CS No. 27 of 2010
                IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction


  NICCO CORPORATION LIMITED
    Versus
  OIL & NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.


  For Petitioner: Mr.Anindya Mitra,Sr.Advocate with Mr.Abhrajit
                 Mitra, Mr.Jishnu Chowdhury, Ms.R. Kajaria


  BEFORE:
  The Hon'ble JUSTICE PATHERYA
  Date : 12th February, 2010.


                The Court : In a suit for monies and cancellation of notice

dated 1st February, 2010 this application has been filed and orders sought.

                The case of the petitioner is that certain works were

awarded to it and the same was to be completed within a time fixed. Such

time was extended from time to time. Such extensions have been granted

till 15th February, 2010. In fact the petitioner was asked to furnish

requisite documents substantiating its request for extension till 31st

December, 2010 and such documents have also been forwarded. Inspite

thereof no decision has been taken on the said documents furnished but

letter dated 1st February, 2010 issued. Such letter has been issued on the

premise that the progress of work is meagre and the operations have come
                                        2



to a standstill. In fact no payment has been received by the petitioner since

February, 2009 and therefore failure, if any, cannot be attributed to the

petitioner. Hence the instant application has been filed and orders sought.

                 No notice of this application has been served on the

respondents as the petitioner apprehends that sums due to it will be

deducted by the respondents.

Having considered the facts of the case and as the documents for extension were furnished on 12th December, 2009 the same ought to have been considered by now. Non-consideration and also no payments made to the petitioner evidences the intention of the respondents not to honour the terms of the agreement and therefore prima facie no progress, if any, can be attributed to the petitioner alone. Accordingly, the parties are directed to maintain status quo as on date till 22nd February, 2010.

The forum selection clause is not definite and therefore, prima facie is not applicable in the instant case.

Matter to appear in the list on 19th February, 2010. All parties to act on a photostat signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.

( PATHERYA, J.) 3