Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Jagjitsingh Kisansingh Gambhir vs The State Of Maharashtra on 9 June, 2022

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

                                                                                           10-WP-3999-2019.doc




                                             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                   CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3999 OF 2019

                              Jagjitsingh Kisansingh Gambhir                          ...Petitioner
                                     Versus
                              The State Of Maharashtra                                ...Respondent
                                                                         ....
                              Mr. Amin Solkar i/by Ms. Misbah Solkar, Advocate for the
                              Petitioner/Applicant
                              Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for the Respondent - State.


                                                       CORAM       :        PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
                                                       DATE        :        9th JUNE, 2022.

                              PER COURT:

1. The Petitioner has been prosecuted for offence under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 ( for short "MCOC Act"). He had preferred an application under Section 11 of MCOC Act which has been rejected by the trial Court.

2. Learned APP submitted that the proceedings were initially pending before the Special Court at Nashik. Subsequently, the proceedings have been transferred to the Special Court at Ahmednagar on account of notification. Learned APP has placed on record the communication dated 24th November, 2022 regarding transfer of the proceedings. The same is taken on record. Learned APP submitted that, in view of the transfer of proceedings to the Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR Date:

                              Sajakali Jamadar                         1 of 2
JAMADAR    2022.06.10
           18:57:05
           +0530
                                                                10-WP-3999-2019.doc




trial Court at Ahmednagar, this bench has no jurisdiction to entertain this petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned order was passed by the Special Court at Nashik and although the proceedings were transferred to the Court of Ahmednagar, the petition can be entertained by this bench. He also submitted that this fact was brought to the notice of this Court on the previous occasion. Learned APP however submitted that there is no order in that regard passed by this Court.

4. In light of the aforesaid factual aspects, the registry is requested to verify whether the petition can be heard by this Court or it is required to transferred to Aurangabad Bench of this Court.

5. Stand over to 23rd June, 2022.





                                             (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)




Sajakali Jamadar                       2 of 2