Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Lakhwinder Singh And Anr vs State Of Punjab on 20 December, 2022

Author: Pankaj Jain

Bench: Pankaj Jain

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

                                  CRM-M-42262-2022
                                  Date of decision : 20.12.2022

Lakhwinder Singh and another                                 ...... Petitioners

                                  versus
State of Punjab                                               ...... Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

Present :- None for the petitioners.

         Mr. Arun Gupta, AAG, Punjab.
                 ***
PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

While issuing notice of motion, following order was passed:-

"Apprehending his arrest in FIR No.0019 dated 23.01.2022 for offences punishable under Sections 353, 186, 427, 323, 336, 34 IPC and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Div.A, Police Commissionerate, District Amritsar, the petitioner has preferred this petition under Section 438 Cr. P.C seeking pre-arrest bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia contends that infact it is a case of brawl and the injuries alleged to have been caused are simple in nature.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of the Court Mr. Sarabjit Singh Cheema, DAG.,Punjab who is present in Court accepts notice.
In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on interim bail subject to their furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer/Investigating Officer. As and when called, the petitioners shall join the investigation. They shall abide by the conditions enumerated under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
To come up on 20.12.2022."

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 22-12-2022 06:50:39 ::: CRM-M-42262-2022 -2-

2. Today, learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Lakhwinder Singh, submits that the petitioners have joined investigation and are no more required for custodial interrogation.

3. In view of above, the interim order dated 15.09.2022 passed by this Court is made absolute, subject to the conditions as enumerated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

4. Petition stands disposed off.



                                                      ( PANKAJ JAIN )
                                                          JUDGE
20.12.2022
Dinesh

                          Whether speaking/reasoned         Yes

                          Whether Reportable :              No




                                      2 of 2
                   ::: Downloaded on - 22-12-2022 06:50:40 :::