Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Hari.T. Aged 22 Years vs Central Board Of Secondary Education

Author: Antony Dominic

Bench: Antony Dominic

       

  

  

 
 
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                          PRESENT:

                    THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC

           MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/22ND MAGHA 1934

                                 WP(C).No. 10657 of 2012 (F)
                                    ---------------------------

    PETITIONER(S) :
    ---------------------

      HARI.T. AGED 22 YEARS, S/O.MADHAVAN M.P.,
      ALAMBADI HOUSE, PURAMERI P.O.
      VADAKARA, KOZHIKODE-673503.

      BY ADVS.SRI.K.S.MADHUSOODANAN
                   SRI.THOMAS CHAZHUKKARAN
                   SRI.M.M.VINOD KUMAR
                   SRI.P.K.RAKESH KUMAR
                   SMT.M.A.RUXANA

    RESPONDENT(S) :
    ------------------------

   1. CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION
      REGIONAL OFFICE, NEW PLOT NO.3
      (OLD BLOCK NO.1630 A) J BLOCK
      ANNANAGAR WEST
      CHENNAI-40 REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SECRETARY.

   2. PRINCIPAL RANI PUBLIC SCHOOL,
      CHORODE, VADAKARA 673106
      KOZHIKODE.

      R1 BY ADVS. SRI.DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
                          SRI.K.M.ANEESH
      R2 BY ADV. SRI.K.P.SUDHEER
                       SRI.ARUN MATHEW VADAKKAN

      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD
      ON 11-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED
      THE FOLLOWING:

BP

WP(C).No. 10657 of 2012 (F)

                                  APPENDIX


PETITIONER(S) EXHIBITS :


EXHIBIT-P1.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE CERTIFICATE FOR ALL INDIA SECONDARY
              EXAMINATION, 2005 DATED 24.5.05 ISSUED BY CONTROLLER OF
              EXAMINATION.

EXHIBIT-P1(a).PHOTOCOPY OF THE MARKLIST.

EXHIBIT-P2.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORIGINAL DATE OF BIRTH ISSUED BY
              RAMAKRISHNAN ASHRAMAM MISSION HOSPITAL, SASTHAMANGALAM,
              THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

EXHIBIT-P4.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE ABSTRACT OF CORRECTED ADMISSION REGISTER
              ISSUED ON 28.10.11.

EXHIBIT-P4(a).PHOTOCOPY OF THE CORRECTION OF DATE OF BIRTH EFFECTED AT
              SCHOOL RECORD IN KRHS.

EXHIBIT-P5.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE PETITIONER'S APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF
              DATE OF BIRTH TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT THROUGH 2ND RESPONDENT
              IN A PRESCRIBED FORM DATED 20.12.2011.

EXHIBIT-P6.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEARING
              NO.ROM/CORRN/REJECTION/DOB/2012/2412 DATED 28.3.12.

EXHIBIT-P7.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WRIT APPEAL NO.1948/08
              DATED 5.8.2009.

EXHIBIT-P8.   PHOTOCOPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C) NO.9109/2011 DATED 31.5.11.


RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS :                NIL.

                                                             //TRUE COPY//


                                                             P.A. TO JUDGE

BP



                        ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                      ================
                   W.P.(C) NO. 10657 OF 2012
                   ===================

            Dated this the 11th day of February, 2013

                           J U D G M E N T

Petitioner was the student of a school, of which the 2nd respondent is the Principal . According to him, his date of birth is 7/8/1989 and that it has been wrongly noted in the certificates issued by the 1st respondent as 6/8/1989. Therefore, he submitted Ext.P5 application to the 1st respondent through the school. That has been rejected by Ext.P6 order on the ground that the application is belated. It is challenging Ext.P6, the writ petition is filed.

It is seen that similar issues have been decided by this Court and applications similar to Ext.P5 were ordered to be reconsidered by Exts.P7 and P8 judgments of this Court. Consistent with the above, this writ petition is also disposed of setting aside Ext.P6 and directing the 1st respondent to reconsider the application and pass fresh orders thereon. This the 1st respondent shall do as expeditiously as possible at any rate within two months of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE Rp