Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Rajneesh Kumar Ambedkar vs Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi ... on 7 July, 2025

                                      के ीय सूचना आयोग
                               Central Information Commission
                                    बाबा गं गनाथ माग,मुिनरका
                                Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka
                                 नई िद    ी, New Delhi - 110067
ि तीय अपील सं        ा / Second Appeal No. CIC/MGAHV/A/2024/623373

Rajneesh Kumar Ambedkar                                           ... अपीलकता/Appellant

                                         VERSUS
                                          बनाम
CPIO: Mahatma Gandhi
Antarrashtriya Hindi                                        ... ितवादीगण/Respondents
University, Wardha
Maharashtra

Relevant dates emerging from the appeal:

RTI : 22.01.2023                FA       : 24.02.2023             SA     : 02.06.2024

CPIO : 22.02.2023               FAO : 21.03.2023                  Hearing : 07.07.2025


Date of Decision: 07.07.2025
                                          CORAM:
                                    Hon'ble Commissioner
                                  _ANANDI RAMALINGAM
                                         ORDER

1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 22.01.2023 seeking information on the following points:

1. महा ा गांधी अंतररा ीय िहंदी िव िव ालय म स : 2010-2022 तक कुल िकतने ोफेसर सेवािनवृ ए, नाम सिहत, िवभाग का नाम भी बताए। उसकी मािणत छाया ित दान कर।
2. िनयिमत ोफेसर सेवािनवृ होने के बाद उनके शोध-िनदशन म िकतने शोधािथयों को पी-एच.डी. उपािध दान की गई। उसकी मािणत छाया ित दान कर।
Page 1 of 4
3. िनयिमत ोफेसर सेवािनवृ होने के बाद उनके शोध-िनदशन म शोधािथयों को िकस ावधान/िनयमावली के तहत पी-एच.डी. उपािध दान की गई। उसकी मािणत छाया ित दान कर।
4. िनयिमत ोफेसर सेवािनवृ होने के बाद उनके शोध-िनदशन म िकतने शोधािथयों के शोध-िनदशक बदले गए। उसकी मािणत छाया ित दान कर।

2. The CPIO replied vide letter dated 22.02.2023 and the same is reproduced as under :-

1. 1. ो. इलीना सेन - ी अ यन िवभाग
2. ो. शंभु कुमार गु - ी अ यन िवभाग
3. ो. सुरेश शमा - ना कला िवभाग
4. ो. उमाशंकर उपा ाय - भाषा िव ापीठ
5. ो. सूरज साद पालीवाल - सािह िवभाग
6. ो. रिव चतुवदी- ना कला िवभाग
7. ो. दे वराज - अनुवाद एवं िनवचन िव ापीठ
8. ो. िवजय कुमार कौल - भाषा अ यन क
9. ो. मनोज कुमार - वधा समाज काय सं थान
2. 04
1.http://www.mgahv.in/pdf/gen/gen2019/KuIdeep%20Kumar%20Pandey%20Ph .D.%20Notification%20dated%2014.08.2019.Pdf
2.http://www.mgahv.in/pdf/gen/gen2020/Ph.D.%20Notification%20of%20Jeete ndra.Pdf
3.http://www.mgahv.in/pdf/gen/gen2022/Notification PhD Awards Rachana Rai.pdf
4. http://www.mgahv.in/pdf/gen/gen2018/Kumar Gaurav Mishra 14 11 2018.Pdf

3. िव िव ालय की वेबसाइट पर उपल पी-एच.डी. अ ादे श का अवलोकन कर https://hindivishwa.org/contentdtl.aspx?category=1&cgid=1 Page 2 of 4

4. 01 (एक) अिधसूचना संल है।कुछ इकाईयों से जानकारी शेष है अतः जानकारी ा होने के प ात आपको ेिषत की जाएगी।

3. Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 24.02.2023 alleging that the information provided was incomplete, false and misleading. The FAA vide order dated 21.03.2023 upheld the reply given by the CPIO.

4. Aggrieved with the FAA's order, the Appellant approached the Commission with the instant Second Appeal dated 02.06.2024.

5. The appellant remained absent during the hearing despite notice and on behalf of the respondent Dr. Balaji, Associate Professor, attended the hearing through video conference.

6. The respondent, while defending their case, reaffirmed their earlier response dated 22.02.2023 and submitted that point-wise all relevant available information had been furnished to the appellant.

7. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the respondent and perusal of records, observes that the CPIO has provided an appropriate reply to the appellant vide letter dated 22.02.2023. Further, in the absence of the appellant to plead his case or contest the CPIO's submissions, the Commission finds no scope of intervention in the matter. With this observation, the appeal is disposed of.

Copy of the decision be provided free of cost to the parties.

Sd/-

(Anandi Ramalingam) (आनंदी रामिलंगम) Information Commissioner (सूचना आयु ) िदनांक/Date: 07.07.2025 Authenticated true copy O. P. Pokhriyal (ओ. पी. पोख रयाल) Dy. Registrar (उप पंजीयक) 011-26180514 Page 3 of 4 Addresses of the parties:

1 The CPIO Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi University, Post - Hindi Vishwavidyalaya, Gandhi Hills, Wardha, Maharashtra - 442001 2 Rajneesh Kumar Ambedkar Page 4 of 4 Recomendation(s) to PA under section 25(5) of the RTI Act, 2005:-
Nil Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)