Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Gujarat High Court

Veer Narmad South Gujarat University vs Satishkumar Ramjibhai Patel & 2 on 21 January, 2014

Author: Ks Jhaveri

Bench: Ks Jhaveri, A.G.Uraizee

         C/LPA/1528/2010                             ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

             LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1528 of 2010

          In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1054 of 2010
                                  TO
              LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 1531 of 2010
                                  In
            SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1057 of 2010
================================================================
      VEER NARMAD SOUTH GUJARAT UNIVERSITY....Appellant(s)
                           Versus
        SATISHKUMAR RAMJIBHAI PATEL & 2....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR HARSHADRAY A DAVE, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1
GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR NILESH M SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
               and
               HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.G.URAIZEE

                           Date : 21/01/2014


                            ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI) The   present   appeals   have   been   filed   challenging  the order dated 15/2/2010 passed by the learned Single  Judge in SCA nos. 1054 of 2010 to 1057 of 2010.

In light of the recent decision dated 26/12/2013  of   the   Larger   Bench   of   this   Court   in   L.P.A.   No.  596/2008 and cognate appeals, the present appeals are  not maintainable as the appellants have not made the  Page 1 of 2 C/LPA/1528/2010 ORDER concerned Tribunal as a party in the writ petitions.

We, however, clarify that the appellants shall be  at   liberty   to   challenge   the   impugned   order   of   the  learned Single Judge before the appropriate forum and the delay occurred in challenging the impugned order  of   the   learned   Judge   before   the   Appellate   Authority  would not come in the way of the appellants.

With these observations, the present appeals are  disposed of without expressing any opinion on merits.  Interim relief, if any, to continue for a period of  twelve weeks from the date of receipt of writ of this  order.

(K.S.JHAVERI, J.) (A.G.URAIZEE,J) *asma Page 2 of 2