Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Sukhabhai Mavjibhai Patel & vs State Of Gujarat on 29 January, 2016

Author: A.J.Desai

Bench: A.J.Desai

                   R/CR.MA/2224/2016                                                ORDER



                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL) NO. 2224 of 2016

         ==========================================================
                       SUKHABHAI MAVJIBHAI PATEL & 1....Applicant(s)
                                        Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT....Respondent(s)
         ==========================================================
         Appearance:
         MR ASHISH M DAGLI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1 - 2
         MR LB DABHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
         ==========================================================

                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.J.DESAI

                                         Date : 29/01/2016


                                          ORAL ORDER

1. Mr.   Chirag   Patel   learned   advocate   is   permitted   to   file   his  appearance on behalf  of  the  original  complainant and shall file  within a period of three days. He also placed on record a copy of  affidavit on behalf the original complainant and the same is taken  on record. He has also identified the complainant who is present  in the Court.

2. Rule. Mr. L.B.Dabhi, Learned APP waives service of notice of Rule  on  behalf   of   respondent­State   and   Mr.   Chirag   Parekh   learned  advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the original  complainant.

3. This application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal  Procedure for regular bail in connection with F.I.R. registered at  C.R.No.  I   ­   93  of  2015  with  Vadhavan  Police  Station  for   the  offences punishable  under Sections 34385, 506(2) and 120(B)  Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Sun Jan 31 02:46:44 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/2224/2016 ORDER etc. of the IPC.

4. Learned advocate for the applicants submits that considering the  nature of offence, the applicant may be enlarged on regular bail  by imposing suitable conditions.

5. The learned APP opposes the grant of bail looking to the nature  and gravity of offences.

6.  I   have   heard   learned   advocates   appearing   for   the   parties. 

Considering the dispute between the parties, the affidavit filed by  the original complainant in the matter, also considering the fact  that the dispute between the partied is settled and the offence as  alleged in the FIR and also considering the nature of allegations  made  in   the  FIR,   I  am   of   the  opinion   that   this  is   a   fit   case   to  exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicants on bail. Hence,  the  application  is  allowed and the  applicants are ordered to be  released on bail in connection with  C.R.No. I ­ 93 of 2015 with  Vadhavan   Police   Station  on   executing   a   bond   of  Rs.10,000/­  (Rupees   Ten   Thousand   only)   each  with   one   surety   of   the   like  amount to the  satisfaction  of the  trial Court and subject to the  conditions that they shall;

[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

[b]  not   act   in   a   manner   injuries   to   the   interest   of   the  prosecution;

[c]  surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

[d]  not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of  the Sessions Judge concerned;

[e]  mark   presence   at   the   concerned   police   station   on   every  Monday for a period of three months and thereafter on any  Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Sun Jan 31 02:46:44 IST 2016 R/CR.MA/2224/2016 ORDER day   of   first   week   of   each   English   Calender   Month   for   a  period of six months;

[f]  furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also  to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall  not change the residence without prior permission of this  Court;

7.  The   Authorities   will   release   the   applicants   only   if   they   are   not  required in connection with any other offence for the time being.  If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions  Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate  action in the matter. Bail bond to be executed before the lower  court having jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the  concerned Court to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above  conditions in accordance with law. At the trial, the trial court shall  not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua  the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the  applicants on bail.

8.  Rule   made   absolute   to   the   aforesaid   extent.   Direct   service   is  permitted.

(A.J.DESAI, J.)  *Kazi...

Page 3 of 3

HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Sun Jan 31 02:46:44 IST 2016