Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

M/S. Thyrocare Technologies Limited vs The State Of Maharashtra Through The ... on 29 September, 2020

Author: Madhav J.Jamdar

Bench: R. D. Dhanuka, Madhav J.Jamdar

                      KVM

                                                         1/2
                                                                            6-CPST92632 OF 2020.doc

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
          Digitally signed
Kanchan   by Kanchan V.
          Mayekar                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
V.        Date:
Mayekar
          2020.09.30
          12:19:16               CONTEMPT PETITION (ST) NO. 92632 OF 2020
          +0530
                                                   IN
                                      WP-ASDB-LD-VC NO. 196 OF 2020
                      M/s.Thyrocare Technologies Ltd.                     ..... Petitioner
                              VERSUS
                      State of Maharashtra & Ors.                        ..... Respondents
                      Mr.G.S.Hegde, a/w. Ms.P.M.Bhansali for the Petitioner.

                      Mr.P.P.Kakade, G.P., a/w. Mrs.M.M.Shrivastav, A.G.P. for the
                      Respondent - State.
                                                CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND
                                                       MADHAV J.JAMDAR, JJ.

DATE : 29th SEPTEMBER, 2020.

(THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) P.C:-

Learned A.G.P. on instructions states that pursuant to the order dated 17th September, 2020 passed by this court, the respondent no.2 has granted personal hearing to the petitioner and has already recalled the earlier order passed by the respondent no.2 and has already permitted the petitioner to restart collecting samples for carrying out test. Learned A.G.P. further states that the petitioner has already restarted collecting samples for carrying out test in Pimpri Chinchwad area.

2. Learned G.P. to furnish a copy of the said order/communication to the petitioner's advocate by tomorrow 5 p.m.

3. Ms. Bhansali Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the order already having been passed by the respondent no.2, KVM 2/2 6-CPST92632 OF 2020.doc this contempt petition may be disposed of. Statement is accepted.

4. In view of the respondent no.2 having complied with the order passed by this court, we do not propose to take any action under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act against the respondent no.2. Contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.

5. This order will be digitally signed by the Personal Assistant of this Court. Associate of this Court is permitted to forward the parties copy of this order by e-mail. All concerned to act on digitally signed copy of this order.

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]                    [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]