Bombay High Court
Commissioner Of Income Tax(It) 4 vs M/S Savvis Communication Corporation on 10 December, 2018
Bench: Akil Kureshi, M.S. Sanklecha
11. os itxa 90-13 group.doc
R.M. AMBERKAR
(Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 90 OF 2013
Director of Income Tax (IT)-I .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. UPS SCS (Asia) Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 80 OF 2015
Director of Income Tax (IT)-I .. Appellant
Vs
Deutsche Bank A.G. .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 922 OF 2015
Director of Income Tax (IT)-2 .. Appellant
Vs
Oman International Bank .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 938 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 941 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 945 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 961 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 986 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1005 OF 2016
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1010 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 4 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Kamala Mills Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1023 OF 2016
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)-4 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Siemens Ltd .. Respondent
1 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 11/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/12/2018 23:05:06 :::
11. os itxa 90-13 group.doc
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1039 OF 2016
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 4 .. Appellant
Vs
Sitadevi Mittal .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 64 OF 2017
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 68 OF 2017
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 89 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax-LTU .. Appellant
Vs
IDBI Bank Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 70 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 2 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Fugro Rovtech Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 136 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 2 .. Appellant
Vs
Farid Gulmohamed .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 644 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 2 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Hanjin Shipping Company Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 685 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 2 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Germanischer Lloyd AG Indian Br. .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1546 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 4 .. Appellant
Vs
UFIS Airport Solutions P Ltd .. Respondent
2 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 11/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/12/2018 23:05:06 :::
11. os itxa 90-13 group.doc
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1573 OF 2017
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -9 .. Appellant
Vs
Froid Finance & Investment P Ltd .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1611 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 4 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Savvis Communication Corporation .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 1645 OF 2017
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 3 .. Appellant
Vs
Ashok Kailash Chandra Nigam .. Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (IT) NO. 205 OF 2018
Commissioner of Income Tax (IT) 4 .. Appellant
Vs
M/s. Warner Brother Distributing Inc. .. Respondent
...................
Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellants
Mr. Atul Jasani for the Respondents in ITXA 90/13 & 1023/16
Mr. Bharat Damodar i/by Kanga & Co for the Respondent in ITXA
80/15
Ms. Rutuja Pawar i/by S.C. Tiwari for the Respondent in ITXA
1039/16
Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondents in ITXA 64/17, 68/17, 70/17 &
89/17
Mr. Ravindra Poojary i/by Ajaykumar Singh for the Respondent in
ITXA 205/18
...................
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2018.
P.C.:
3 of 4
::: Uploaded on - 11/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/12/2018 23:05:06 :::
11. os itxa 90-13 group.doc
1. All these appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act" for short) have been filed challenging the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
2. Learned counsel appearing in support of the appeals, states that he has been instructed to withdraw these appeals. This is for the reason that the tax effect involved in all these appeals is less than the threshold limit of Rs. 50 Lacs as provided in CBDT Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018.
3. In view of the above submission, the appeals are dismissed as not pressed.
4. Refund of court fees as per rules. [ M.S. SANKLECHA, J. ] [ AKIL KURESHI, J ] 4 of 4 ::: Uploaded on - 11/12/2018 ::: Downloaded on - 26/12/2018 23:05:06 :::