Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Smt. Anu Mahindru vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 19 May, 2015

Bench: Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

        IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

                                                                      CWP No. 8337 of 2014
                                                                      a/w CWPs No. 8338, 8340,
                                                                      8341, 8350 to 8353 of 2014




                                                                                                  .

                                                                      Decided on: 19.05.2015





    1. CWP No. 8337 of 2014
    Smt. Anu Mahindru                                                                       ...Petitioner.

                                                     Versus





    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................

    2. CWP No. 8338 of 2014
    Sh. Ajay Lotheta
                               r                                                            ...Petitioner.

                                                     Versus

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................



    3. CWP No. 8340 of 2014
    Sh. Rajesh Chauhan                                                                      ...Petitioner.




                                                     Versus





    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................





    4. CWP No. 8341 of 2014
    Dr. Shyam Chand                                                                         ...Petitioner.

                                                     Versus

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................

    5. CWP No. 8350 of 2014
    Sh. Balvir Singh                                                                        ...Petitioner.




                                                                          ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:12:32 :::HCHP
                                                             -: 2 :-

                                                     Versus

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.




                                                                                                  .
    ........................................................................................................................





    6. CWP No. 8351 of 2014
    Sh. Akshay Bhardwaj                                                                     ...Petitioner.





                                                     Versus

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................

    7. CWP No. 8352 of 2014
    Sh. Praveen Kumar Sharma   r                       to
                                                     Versus
                                                                                            ...Petitioner.

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.
    ........................................................................................................................

    8. CWP No. 8353 of 2014



    Sh. Sunil Kumar                                                                         ...Petitioner.

                                                     Versus




    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                                      ...Respondents.





    Coram





    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice.
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting? Yes.


    For the petitioner(s):                      Mr. M.L. Sharma, Senior Advocate, with
                                                M/s. B.L. Soni & Aman Parth Sharma,
                                                Advocates.

    For the respondents:                        Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with
                                                Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma,




                                                                          ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:12:32 :::HCHP
                                        -: 3 :-

                                Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K.
                                Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for
                                respondent No. 1.




                                                                    .

                                Mr.   J.L.   Bhardwaj,            Advocate,         for
                                respondents No. 2 and 3.





    Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)

Mr. B.L. Soni, learned counsel for the writ petitioners stated at the Bar that respondents No. 2 and 3 have filed reply in CWP No. 8337 of 2014 and prayed that all these writ petitions may be disposed of in terms of the reply contained in para 14 (I to IX), with all just exceptions, with a direction to respondents No. 2 and 3 to do the needful within four weeks. His statement is taken on record.

2. Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, learned counsel for respondents No. 2 and 3, stated at the Bar that he is not averse to the said proposition, however, sought three months' time to do the needful. His statement is also taken on record.

3. Keeping in view the submissions made, we deem it proper to dispose of these writ petitions in terms of para 14 (I to IX) (supra) of the reply filed by respondents No. 2 and 3, with all just exceptions, with a direction to do the needful within eight weeks and report compliance before the Registrar (Judicial).

4. The writ petitions are disposed of accordingly alongwith ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:12:32 :::HCHP -: 4 :- all pending applications.

Copy dasti.

.

(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge May 19, 2015 ( rajni ) r to ::: Downloaded on - 15/04/2017 18:12:32 :::HCHP