Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Achuthan Traders vs Reserve Bank Of India on 11 August, 2023

Author: N.Seshasayee

Bench: N.Seshasayee

                                                                        W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               Reserved on : 31.07.2023

                                            Pronounced on : 11.08.2023

                                        CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE

                                          W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020

                     W.P.No.10970 of 2020 :

                     Achuthan Traders
                     Represented by its Proprietrix T.Shanthi
                     W/o. Mr.P.Saravanan
                     No.63/2A, Chetpet Main Road
                     Neelampoondi, Gingee Taluk
                     Villupuram District.                                     ... Petitioner

                                                            Vs.

                     1.Reserve Bank of India
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Banking Ombudsman
                       Reserve Bank of India
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Deputy Manager
                      DBS Bank India Limited
                      4/1, Sardar Patel Road
                      Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

                     4.The Manager
                       DBS Bank India Limited
                       Gingee Branch
                       Gingee - 604 202.                          ...   Respondents



                    1/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                      W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020

                         [R3 & R4 cause title amended vide order dated
                            20.06.2023 made in WMP.No.17334 of 2023
                            in W.P.No.10970 of 2020]

                     W.P.No.10970 of 2020 :

                     VPN Traders
                     Represented by its Proprietor Mr.P.Saravanan
                     S/o. Late Mr.V.Perumal Nainar
                     No.63/2A, Chetpet Main Road
                     Neelampoondi, Gingee Taluk
                     Villupura District.                              ... Petitioner


                     1.Reserve Bank of India
                       Chennai.

                     2.The Banking Ombudsman
                       Reserve Bank of India
                       Chennai.

                     3.The Deputy Manager
                      DBS Bank India Limited
                      4/1, Sardar Patel Road
                      Guindy, Chennai - 600 032.

                     4.The Manager
                       DBS Bank India Limited
                       Gingee Branch, Gingee - 604 202.
                       [R3 & R4 cause title suo motu amended vide
                           order dated 11.08.2023]

                     PRAYER in W.P.No.10970 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226
                     of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
                     calling for the entire records pertaining to email letter dated 04.11.2019
                     issued by the third respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the

                    2/8
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                         W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020

                     respondents to pay the penal charges of Rs.5,90,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs
                     Ninety Thousand only) along with 12% as per RBI norms.


                     PRAYER in W.P.No.10976 of 2020 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226
                     of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
                     calling for the entire records pertaining to email letter dated 04.11.2019
                     issued by the third respondent, quash the same and consequently direct the
                     respondents to pay the penal charges of Rs.8,85,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs
                     Eighty Five Thousand only) along with 12% as per RBI norms.


                                  For Petitioners : Mr.T.Karunakaran
                                  (in both WPs)
                                  For Respondents : Mr.C.Mohan of M/s.King & Patridge
                                  (in both WPs)     for R1 & R2
                                                    Mr.N.G.Durairajan for R4


                                            COMMON             ORDER


1.1 Shanti and Saravanan were proprietors of two business concerns. They availed separate cash credit facility originally with Axis Bank, and this loan was transferred to M/s.Lakshmi Vilas Bank. (M/s.Lakshmi Vilas Bank was since amalgamated with M/s DBS Bank India Limited, respondents 3 and 4 are M/s.DBS Bank Ltd.,). This had occurred in 2017 and it was to operate for a year from 20.01.2017 to 19.01.2018 and the value of the loan is Rs.200 Lakhs (in W.P.No.10970 of 2020 filed by Shanti) and Rs.260 Lakhs (in 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020 W.P.10976 of 2020 filed by Saravanan).

1.2 After the expiry of the initial one year period, it was further extended for another one year from 12.03.2018 to 11.03.2019. Thereafter both the petitioners sought for further renewal, but this time it was granted only for three months from 05.09.2019 to 04.12.2019. 1.3 While so, on 22.10.2019, the petitioner had transferred the entire loan liability in both the loan accounts of both the petitioners to M/s.Tamilnadu Mercantile Bank, Gingee branch. Thereafter, the third respondent vide email dated 23.10.2019, required both the petitioners to pay 3% penal interest for pre-closure of loans. In W.P.No.10970 of 2020, the claim was for Rs.7,08,000/- whereas in W.P. 10976 of 2020 it was Rs.10,62,000/-. The penalty interest rate was later reduced from 3% to 2.25% and this brought down the penalty from Rs.7.08 Lakhs to Rs.5.90 Lakhs in W.P. 10976 of 2020, and from Rs.10,62,000/-. to Rs.8,85,000/-. 1.4 The petitioner challenged the same before the Ombudsman, but in vain, and hence, he is before this Court.

4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners made a pointed submission that he had not pre-closed any loan liability, but closed it only after the extended period of loan.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents / bank submitted that as per Clause 12 of the Sanction letter of the petitioner, there is a specific stipulation that in case of takeover of term loans and working capital credit limit accounts by any other bank 3% penal interest will be charged on the outstanding balance in case of pre-closure. He further submitted that notwithstanding the fact that the respondent can levy penalty at 3%, it has charged penalty only at 2.25%.

4. On careful consideration of the rival submissions, this Court is not in agreement with the contention of the petitioner, and the reasons are :

(a) A sanction letter of the petitioner indeed enables the bank to levy 3% penal interest on pre-closure. This is contractual and unless the levy is not supported by the sanction of law, it will have its force. In this regard, RBI has only exempted home loan from levy 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020 of penal charges for pre-closures, but not commercial loans.
(b) Contrary to the contention of the petitioner, loans with respondents 3 and 4 were transferred to Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank on 22.10.2019, midway through the last extension of loan given by these respondents. Inasmuch as there is a pre-closure of commercial loans during the loan period, the petitioner cannot escape paying the penal charges as stipulated in the sanction letter.

5. In view of the reasons stated above, both the writ petitions stand dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

11.08.2023 Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Non-speaking order anu/ds 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020 To:

1.Reserve Bank of India Chennai.
2.The Banking Ombudsman Reserve Bank of India Chennai.
7/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020 N.SESHASAYEE.J., ds Pre-delivery order in W.P.Nos.10970 & 10976 of 2020 11.08.2023 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis