Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Duroply Industries Limited vs Maamansa Enterprises Pvtltd.And Anr on 10 January, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Narula

Bench: Sanjeev Narula

                          $~7
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          +     C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 6/2022
                                DUROPLY INDUSTRIES LIMITED                                ..... Petitioner
                                                   Through:     Mr. Sushant Singh, Ms. Geetika
                                                                Kapur and Mr. Sourav Pattanaik,
                                                                Advocates.

                                                   versus

                                MAAMANSA ENTERPRISES PVTLTD.AND ANR..... Respondents
                                                   Through:     Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,
                                                                CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra,
                                                                Mr. Sagar Mehlawat and Mr.
                                                                Alexander      Mathai   Paikaday,
                                                                Advocates for R-2.

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
                                             ORDER

% 10.01.2023

1. Per office noting, memo of parties has not been filed. Petitioner is directed to do the same within two weeks from today.

2. Mr. Sushant Singh, counsel for Petitioner, states that Petitioner is the proprietor of 'DURO family of marks' and has registrations of several marks in its favour which have common prefix of 'DURO'.

3. Further, Mr. Singh has pointed out that although his brief contains a copy of counter statement/ reply filed by Respondent No. 1, he will have to confirm if the same was filed before IPAB. If such is the case, Petitioner is permitted to place a copy thereof on record, along with an affidavit in support.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:11.01.2023 12:47:55

4. Mr. Singh is further directed to serve a copy of this order on counsel who represented Respondent in proceedings pending before Calcutta High Court in C.S. 94 of 2020, as well as on counsel, who has filed said counter statement/ reply.

5. Re-notify on 20th March, 2023.

SANJEEV NARULA, J JANUARY 10, 2023 d.negi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SAPNA SETHI Signing Date:11.01.2023 12:47:55