Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Janakbhai vs Ahmedabad on 9 August, 2010

Author: M.R.Shah

Bench: M.R. Shah

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/2887/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 2887 of 2010
 

=========================================================


 

JANAKBHAI
JASHUBHAI PATEL & 4 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

AHMEDABAD
URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & 4 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MR
SHALIN N MEHTA for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 5. 
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for Respondent(s) : 1 -
3. 
MR BHARAT JANI for Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR SUDHANSHU S PATEL
for Respondent(s) : 4 -
5. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 09/08/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER 

Shri Shalin Mehta, learned advocate for the petitioners has submitted that without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the respective parties and assuming for the moment that the case on behalf of the private respondents to have 10% of the common plot is considered in that case also, there is no common plot admeasuring about 10% of the total area of Block No.713. The aforesaid is disputed by Shri Asim Pandya, learned advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5. It is submitted that there is a plot available, the area of which shall be not less than 10% of the total area of Block No.713 and let AUDA submit the report before this Court. Under the circumstances, before considering the present petition on merits and to appreciate the submission of Shri Pandya, learned advocate for respondent nos. 4 and 5, let respondent nos. 4 and 5 identify the plot which is required to be used as common plot, the area of which shall not be less than 10% of the total area of Block No.713 and let the officers of the AUDA measure the same and demarcate the same in presence of the petitioners as well as respondent nos. 4 and 5 and submit the report before this Court on or before next date of hearing. Stand over to 17.8.2010. To be placed in 11 A.M. Board. Direct service is permitted.

(M.R.SHAH,J.) kaushik     Top