Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

G.C.Kanungo (Dead) Through Lrs. vs Rourkela Steel Plant Tr.M.D. on 11 August, 2014

^                                              IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

                                             CIVIL          APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                        CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 7605-7606 OF 2014
                                   [ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. NOS. 11368-11369 OF 2012]

             G.C.KANUNGO (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.                                              ...     APPELLANT(s)

                                                             Versus

         ROURKELA STEEL PLANT THROUGH ITS                                                ...      RESPONDENT(s
)
         MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANOTHER


                                                       O     R      D     E   R


                                         Leave granted.

                            2.           These appeals deserve to be allowed                                 o
n

                            the short ground that although the first recall

                            application made by respondents was dismissed on

                            3.9.2009,        subsequent             recall        application          on    t
he

                            self-same        grounds          was         made    on   16.12.2009.           T
he

                            second recall application has been allowed by the

                            Hon’ble the Chief Justice.                            We are afraid              t
he

                            second recall application by the respondents was an

                            abuse of process of the Court and ought not to have

                            been allowed.              When the first recall application

Signature Not Verified      was      dismissed,             the     remedy        available       to   the
Digitally signed by
Pardeep Kumar
Date: 2014.08.12
09:43:31 IST
Reason:
                             : 2 :

respondents      was   to        challenge       that      order     in

appropriate proceedings but that was never done. In

our view, it       was not open          to the respondents to

make second      application           for recalling the orders

dated 25.2.2001 and 3.9.2009..

3.         Civil Appeals are, accordingly, allowed.

The impugned order is set-aside.                  No order as to

costs.
                                .......................CJI.
                                (R.M. LODHA)


                                ........................J.
                                (KURIAN JOSEPH)


NEW DELHI;                      ........................J.
AUGUST 11,2014                  (ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)
ITEM NO.55                   COURT NO.1                  SECTION XIA

                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)      No(s).
11368-11369/2012

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15/04/2011
in MC No. 49/2009 and     57/2009 arising out of ARBP No. 65/2008
passed by the High Court Of Orissa At Cuttack)

G.C.KANUNGO (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.                           Petitioner(s)

                                    VERSUS

ROURKELA STEEL PLANT TR.M.D.& ANR                         Respondent(s)
[with interim relief and office report)

Date : 11/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
             HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
             HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
             HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

For Petitioner(s)     Mr.   Milan Kanungo, Sr. Adv.
                      Mr.   Ashok Panigrahi,Adv.
                      Mr.   Santosh Kumar, Adv.
                      Ms.   Ashmi Mohan, Adv.

For Respondent(s)     Mr.   Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.
                      Mr.   Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv.
                      Mr.   Samir, Adv.
                      Mr.   Gursimaranjit Singh, Adv.
                      Mr.   K.P.S. Chani,Adv.

          UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
                               O R D E R

Leave granted.

Civil Appeals are allowed in terms of signed order. No costs.

(PARDEEP KUMAR) (RENU DIWAN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER [SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE]