Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri C Nithyananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 2 January, 2020

Author: Suraj Govindaraj

Bench: Suraj Govindaraj

               IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                       DHARWAD BENCH

           DATED THIS THE 02ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2020

                            BEFORE

          THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ

         WRIT PETITION NO.19842/2007(KLR-RR/SUR)


BETWEEN:

SRI C. NITHYANANDA
S/O LATE SRI C HANUMANTHA SETTY
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
R/AT NO 8, WARD NO 4, M.R. TEMPLE LANE,
BRAHMIN STREET, BELLARY.
                                                 PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B.K. MALLIGAWAD, ADV.)

AND:

1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
     REVENUE DEPARTMENT
     5th FLOOR, M S BUILDING,
     VIDHANA VEEDHI,
     BANGALORE -560001,
     REP. BY ITS SECRETARY.

2.   THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
     NORTH RANGE, BELGAUM
     BELGAUM DISTRICT.

3.   THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
     OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND
     RECORDS, D C OFFICE COMPOUND,
     BELLARY.

4.   THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
     CITY SURVEY, D C OFFICE COMPOUND
     BELLARY.
                                  2



5.   SRI C MANJUNATH
     S/O LATE C. HANUMANTHA SETTY
     AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
     NO.11th WARD,MANJUNATH TRADERS,
     CAR STREET, BELLARY.
                                                 ...RESPONDENTS
(By Smt : VEENA HEDGE, AGA FOR R1 - R4
    SRI. GODE NAGARAJ, ADV. FOR R5)

     THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (1) QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DT. 27.2.2007 (ANNEXURE A) PASSED BY THE R2 BY
UPHOLDING THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE R3 DDLR DT. 5.12.2006 IN
APPEAL NO.8/06-07 AS PER ANNEXURE D (2) GRANT INTERIM ORDER
TO STAY THE ORDER DT. 27.2.2007 PASSED BY THE R2 VIDE
ANNEXURE A AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT THERETO
BY DISPENSING WITH PRIOR NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENTS.

    THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                              ORDER

Respondent No.5 has filed a memo on 11.12.2019 stating that the sole petitioner had expired on 03.06.2013, subsequent thereof none have appeared as legal heirs of the petitioner.

The death certificate confirms the fact that sole petitioner has expired on 03.06.2013. In view thereof the petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE MNS/