Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Firoz vs State on 15 June, 2012

Author: J.C.Upadhyaya

Bench: J.C.Upadhyaya

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/8124/2012	 4/ 4	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 8124 of 2012
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

FIROZ
@ ADIL HANIFBHAI JUNEJA - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
ZUBIN F BHARDA for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR. K.L.PANDYA, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE J.C.UPADHYAYA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 15/06/2012 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER 

1. Rule.

Mr. K.L.Pandya, learned APP waives service of Rule on behalf of the respondent-state.

2. The instant application is filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking regular bail in connection with Bhaktinagar Police Station CR No. I - 107/2011 regarding offences punishable under sections 307, 452, 188 read with sections 120(B) and 114 of the Indian Penal Code and section 25(1)(A)(1-B-A) of the Arms Act.

3. Mr. Zubin F. Bharda, learned counsel for the applicant, at the outset, submitted that in the FIR including the applicant, four accused are named and out of them, original accused no. 3 came to be released on bail by the Trial Court and the original accused no. 4 came to be released on regular bail by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2011 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 16288/11. Mr. Zubin further submitted that almost similarly situated co-accused have already been released on bail and in the instant matter, the investigation is over and the charge-sheet is filed.

4. Mr. K.L.Pandya, learned APP for the respondent-State, opposes this application.

5. Having considered the submissions advanced on behalf of both the sides, so also considering the role attributed to the applicant and further the fact that the investigation is over and charge-sheet is filed and that two co-accused have already been released on bail, this Court is of the opinion that the application deserves to be allowed.

6. Learned counsel for the parties do not press for further reasoned order.

7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the application is allowed and the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with first information report registered at CR No. I - 107/2011 with Bhaktinagar Police Station, on executing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall;

(a) not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;

(b) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

(c) surrender passport, if any, to the lower court within a week;

(d) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

(e) mark presence at the concerned police station on the first Sunday of every month between 10.00 a.m. and 3.00 p.m. for three months only;

(f) furnish the present address of residence to the I.O. and also to the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

8. The Authorities will release the applicant only if not required in connection with any other offence for the time being.

9. If breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Trial Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

10. Bail bond to be executed before the lower court having jurisdiction to try the case.

11. For modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions herein above, the applicant/s will be at liberty to approach the concerned Court and such Court shall decide the application for modification and/or deletion of any of the conditions of this order in accordance with law.

12. At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.

13. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. D.S. Permitted.

(J.C.Upadhyaya, J.) cmj/     Top