Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Bayer Healthcare Llc vs Controller General Of Patents, Trade ... on 26 February, 2024

Author: Sanjeev Narula

Bench: Sanjeev Narula

                                    $~51
                                    *           IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                    +           C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 179/2022
                                                BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC                       ..... Appellant
                                                              Through: Ms. Meenal Khurana, Advocate.

                                                                                      versus

                                                CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, TRADE MARKS AND
                                                DESIGNS AND ORS                           ..... Respondents
                                                             Through: Mr. G. Nataraj, Mr. Shashikant Yadav
                                                                      and Mr. Rahul Bhujbal, Advocates for
                                                                      R-3.
                                                                      Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar,
                                                                      CGSC with Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra,
                                                                      Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday and
                                                                      Mr. Krishnan V., Advocates.

                                                CORAM:
                                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
                                                                                      ORDER

% 26.02.2024 I.A. 4418/2024 (on behalf of Respondent No. 3 seeking leave to file additional documents)

1. On the previous date, the Appellant was permitted to produce additional documents. While taking the same on record, the Court had given liberty to Respondent No. 3 to file additional documents in case they were so inclined. Accordingly, the instant application has been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 3 in the above circumstances.

2. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. The documents filed by Respondent No. 3 through Diary No. 531736/2024 on This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 23:57:42 22nd February, 2024 are taken on record.

3. The application is allowed and disposed of.

SANJEEV NARULA, J FEBRUARY 26, 2024 as This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 26/02/2024 at 23:57:42