Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Kross Television India Pvt. Ltd. And Anr vs Vikhyat Chitra Productions And 7 ... on 26 February, 2021

Author: K.R.Shriram

Bench: K.R.Shriram

                                                       1/1                     4.NMCD-510-2017.doc
           Digitally
           signed by
           Gauri A.
Gauri A.   Gaekwad
Gaekwad    Date:
           2021.02.26            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
           18:26:35
           +0530
                                     ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                                          IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
                                 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.510 OF 2017
                                                   WITH
                                 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.519 OF 2017
                                                   WITH
                                 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.775 OF 2017
                                                   WITH
                                      THIRD PARTY NOTICE NO.3 OF 2017
                                                    IN
                                     COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.571 OF 2017

                Kross Television India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.      ....Plaintiffs
                          V/s.
                Vikhyat Chitra Productions & Ors.            ....Defendants
                                                    ----
                Ms. Zalak Mody i/b. A & P Partners for plaintiffs.
                Ms. Bhavika Tiwari a/w. Mr. Hetal Thakkore and Mr. Kunal Parekh i/b.
                M/s. Thakore Jariwala and Associates for defendant no.9.
                                                    ----
                                                     CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 26th FEBRUARY 2021 P.C. :

1 Parties have not signed the consent terms. The lawyers are coming up with all unacceptable excuses for not signing the consent terms and the attempt seems to be only to drag on the proceedings. 2 Stand over to 7th April 2021 for hearing on which date no adjournment will be granted and if parties do not go on with the matter, the suit may itself get dismissed.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad