Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Yogesh Deceased Through Lrs Smt. ... vs Ramvilas Paswan on 7 August, 2025

Author: Vijay Kumar Shukla

Bench: Vijay Kumar Shukla

                         HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH; BENCH AT INDORE

                               MATTERS NOTIFIED AT SERIAL NOS. 1001 TO 1017
          Indore, dated 07.08.2025
                  The Court proposes to pass this common conditional order to obviate passing of identical
          conditional order in these matters involving similar office objection/default.
                       In all these matters, due to non-removal of office objection within the prescribed time
          as per the Rules, the concerned matter was placed before the Registrar in the first instance. The
          Registrar granted sufficient time to the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) to cure the
          defect/office objection, however, due to non-removal of office objection/default within the
          prescribed time, the concerned matter was required to be once again listed before the Court. The
          Court granted further time, by passing common order on the earlier occasion.
                       In spite of repeated opportunity (three times-one under Rules, second by the Registrar
          and third by Court), the petitioner(s)/ applicant(s)/appellant(s) has failed to cure the office
          objection/default. As a result, by way of indulgence and last opportunity, in terms of this order,
          SIX WEEKS' further time is granted to the petitioner(s)/applicant(s)/appellant(s) in the respective
          matters to remove office objection/default and make the matter ready for further hearing within that
          time, failing which the concerned petition/application/appeal shall stand dismissed for non-
          prosecution without further reference to the Court.
                       Provided, however, in cases, where the objection/default is about non-service of
          any of the respondent, on expiry of the extended period, the concerned matter will stand

dismissed for non-prosecution only against the unserved respondent(s), without further reference to the Court. The matter would then proceed against the remaining respondent(s).

In cases where the office objection/default has already been cured before passing of this order, it will be open to the concerned party to bring that fact to the notice of the Registrar (Judicial-II), who may examine the same and proceed with the matter as per the listing /scheme, if ready for hearing.

If the office objections are removed within the time extended in terms of this order, the concerned matter(s) be made returnable on the date notified hereafter.

Sr. No.1001 to 1017 Returnable Date - 23.09.2025 (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE sourabh